Descriptor
Computer Interfaces | 3 |
Computer Software Evaluation | 3 |
Design Preferences | 3 |
Comparative Analysis | 2 |
Online Catalogs | 2 |
User Needs (Information) | 2 |
Academic Libraries | 1 |
Access to Information | 1 |
Bibliographic Records | 1 |
Check Lists | 1 |
Computer Assisted Instruction | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Information Technology and… | 2 |
Author
Cherry, Joan M. | 1 |
Edwards, Kirstie | 1 |
Hopner, Christian | 1 |
Neumann, Gaby | 1 |
Spaepen, Arthur | 1 |
Van Mele, Isabel | 1 |
Verheust, Mieke | 1 |
Ziems, Dietrich | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Germany | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Edwards, Kirstie; Van Mele, Isabel; Verheust, Mieke; Spaepen, Arthur – Information Technology and Libraries, 1997
Three user interfaces to LIBIS, a library catalog accessible through the Internet, were evaluated for use by people who are motor impaired to identify how interface design influences the motor actions necessary to operate the system. Problems and recommendations related to simplicity, consistency, instinctiveness, interaction/feedback, and…
Descriptors: Access to Information, Comparative Analysis, Computer Interfaces, Computer Software Evaluation
Neumann, Gaby; Ziems, Dietrich; Hopner, Christian – 1998
This paper introduces a multimedia-based educational system on logistics developed at the University of Magdeburg (Germany), reports on development and implementation of the prototype, and discusses ideas for redesign. The system was tested, used, and evaluated at the university and within a European network of 24 universities, colleges, and…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Computer Interfaces, Computer Software Development, Computer Software Evaluation

Cherry, Joan M. – Information Technology and Libraries, 1998
Evaluation of data from assessments of full bibliographic displays in academic library OPACs (online public access catalogs) and World Wide Web catalogs against a checklist of desirable features found that OPAC displays scored 58% and Web displays scored 60%. Discusses weaknesses, focusing on those found in the majority of the displays…
Descriptors: Academic Libraries, Bibliographic Records, Check Lists, Comparative Analysis