Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Artificial Intelligence | 2 |
| Cheating | 2 |
| Computer Software | 2 |
| Ethics | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Identification | 1 |
| Inclusion | 1 |
| Integrity | 1 |
| Natural Language Processing | 1 |
| Reliability | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Darius Postma | 2 |
| Don Hickerson | 2 |
| James McGaughran | 2 |
| Jasper Roe | 2 |
| Mike Perkins | 2 |
| Binh H. Vu | 1 |
| Huy Q. Khuat | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMike Perkins; Jasper Roe; Darius Postma; James McGaughran; Don Hickerson – Journal of Academic Ethics, 2024
This study explores the capability of academic staff assisted by the Turnitin Artificial Intelligence (AI) detection tool to identify the use of AI-generated content in university assessments. 22 different experimental submissions were produced using Open AI's ChatGPT tool, with prompting techniques used to reduce the likelihood of AI detectors…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Student Evaluation, Identification, Natural Language Processing
Mike Perkins; Jasper Roe; Binh H. Vu; Darius Postma; Don Hickerson; James McGaughran; Huy Q. Khuat – International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 2024
This study investigates the efficacy of six major Generative AI (GenAI) text detectors when confronted with machine-generated content modified to evade detection (n = 805). We compare these detectors to assess their reliability in identifying AI-generated text in educational settings, where they are increasingly used to address academic integrity…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Inclusion, Computer Software, Word Processing
