Publication Date
In 2025 | 5 |
Descriptor
Source
Higher Education Policy… | 1 |
Information Systems Education… | 1 |
Innovations in Education and… | 1 |
Teaching in Higher Education | 1 |
Thresholds in Education | 1 |
Author
Adam Gonzales | 1 |
Arif Nugroho | 1 |
Bryan Hammer | 1 |
Daire Maria Ni Uanachain | 1 |
David R. Firth | 1 |
Erna Andriyanti | 1 |
Ira Mutiaraningrum | 1 |
Jiahui Luo | 1 |
Josh Freeman | 1 |
Lila Ibrahim Aouad | 1 |
Michelle Louch | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 4 |
Postsecondary Education | 4 |
Location
Asia | 1 |
Indonesia | 1 |
United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
David R. Firth; Adam Gonzales; Michelle Louch; Bryan Hammer – Information Systems Education Journal, 2025
ChatGPT is having an impact on students, and information systems (IS) and computing academic professionals alike. Our goal for this paper is to help faculty and students know the conditions in which generative AI such as ChatGPT should or should not be used. To that end, we describe the development of a 2x2 matrix. On the horizontal axis we have…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Software, Synchronous Communication, Information Systems
Arif Nugroho; Erna Andriyanti; Pratomo Widodo; Ira Mutiaraningrum – Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2025
This study aims to explore the students' experience with ChatGPT in providing scaffolding for writing essays. It also discloses students' appraisals of utilising ChatGPT. Drawing upon data from semi-structured interviews, this study involved 12 students learning English as a Foreign Language who utilised ChatGPT in academic writing classes. The…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Artificial Intelligence, Synchronous Communication, Computer Software
Daire Maria Ni Uanachain; Lila Ibrahim Aouad – Thresholds in Education, 2025
This chapter investigates the dual role of Generative AI (GenAI) in providing support and feedback to students and in reshaping formative and summative educational assessments, addressing both the burgeoning opportunities for enhancing teaching methodologies and the associated ethical challenges. There is a focus on the necessity for balanced…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Software, Technology Integration, Teaching Methods
Jiahui Luo – Teaching in Higher Education, 2025
Many observed that the rise of GenAI is causing an 'erosion of trust' between students and teachers in higher education. Such distrust mainly stems from concerns about student cheating, which is believed to be massively facilitated by recent technological breakthroughs in GenAI. Despite anecdotal discussions, little empirical research has explored…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Software, Trust (Psychology), Technology Uses in Education
Josh Freeman – Higher Education Policy Institute, 2025
Building on our 2024 AI Survey, we surveyed 1,041 full-time undergraduate students through Savanta about their use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools. In 2025, we find that the student use of AI has surged in the last year, with almost all students (92%) now using AI in some form, up from 66% in 2024, and some 88% having used…
Descriptors: Student Surveys, Student Attitudes, Cheating, Artificial Intelligence