Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 2 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Source
Advances in Physiology… | 1 |
Discover Education | 1 |
Educational Technology &… | 1 |
Research Synthesis Methods | 1 |
Author
Ahmed Yaqinuddin | 1 |
Ghaith Assi | 1 |
Kuiper, Joël | 1 |
Lee, Young-Jin | 1 |
Marshall, Iain J. | 1 |
Michelle Cherfane | 1 |
Noel-Storr, Anna | 1 |
Olena Bolgova | 1 |
Tatiana Chaiban | 1 |
Thomas, James | 1 |
Volodymyr Mavrych | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Maryland | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Claude, ChatGPT, Copilot, and Gemini Performance versus Students in Different Topics of Neuroscience
Volodymyr Mavrych; Ahmed Yaqinuddin; Olena Bolgova – Advances in Physiology Education, 2025
Despite extensive studies on large language models and their capability to respond to questions from various licensed exams, there has been limited focus on employing chatbots for specific subjects within the medical curriculum, specifically medical neuroscience. This research compared the performances of Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Anthropic), GPT-3.5 and…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Software, Neurosciences, Medical Education
Tatiana Chaiban; Zeinab Nahle; Ghaith Assi; Michelle Cherfane – Discover Education, 2024
Background: Since it was first launched, ChatGPT, a Large Language Model (LLM), has been widely used across different disciplines, particularly the medical field. Objective: The main aim of this review is to thoroughly assess the performance of the distinct version of ChatGPT in subspecialty written medical proficiency exams and the factors that…
Descriptors: Medical Education, Accuracy, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Software
Marshall, Iain J.; Noel-Storr, Anna; Kuiper, Joël; Thomas, James; Wallace, Byron C. – Research Synthesis Methods, 2018
Machine learning (ML) algorithms have proven highly accurate for identifying Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) but are not used much in practice, in part because the best way to make use of the technology in a typical workflow is unclear. In this work, we evaluate ML models for RCT classification (support vector machines, convolutional neural…
Descriptors: Randomized Controlled Trials, Accuracy, Computer Software, Classification
Lee, Young-Jin – Educational Technology & Society, 2015
This study investigates whether information saved in the log files of a computer-based tutor can be used to predict the problem solving performance of students. The log files of a computer-based physics tutoring environment called Andes Physics Tutor was analyzed to build a logistic regression model that predicted success and failure of students'…
Descriptors: Physics, Science Instruction, Computer Software, Accuracy