Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Bayesian Statistics | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Computer Uses in Education | 1 |
| Data Analysis | 1 |
| Educational Research | 1 |
| Educational Technology | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Intelligent Tutoring Systems | 1 |
| Mastery Learning | 1 |
| Mathematics Instruction | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| International Journal of… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkPardos, Zachary A.; Dailey, Matthew D.; Heffernan, Neil T. – International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2011
The well established, gold standard approach to finding out what works in education research is to run a randomized controlled trial (RCT) using a standard pre-test and post-test design. RCTs have been used in the intelligent tutoring community for decades to determine which questions and tutorial feedback work best. Practically speaking, however,…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Pretests Posttests, Educational Research
