NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bouck, Emily C. – Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 2009
Is a functional curriculum aligned with the federal education policies of No Child Left Behind (2002) and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA, 2004)? This article analyzes the alignment, or lack thereof, between this approach to educating secondary students with mild mental impairment and the two main federal education laws…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Conflict of Interest, Disabilities, Educational Legislation
Manzo, Kathleen Kennedy – Education Week, 2007
The recent wrap-up of an intensive, two-year examination of the federal Reading First initiative is not expected to halt debate over the program. Given the broad agreement in seven federal reports that serious problems occurred in the oversight of the program's implementation, the findings have sparked interest on Capitol Hill, as lawmakers…
Descriptors: Federal Government, Quality Control, Inspection, Reading Programs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Oppenheimer, Todd – Education Next, 2007
Educational software makers are often rebuffed by educational authorities, whose endorsements could lead to governmental stamps of approval, and thus explosive sales. But they usually get warmer receptions in the offices of the nation's school superintendents, who are, after all, their primary customers. The system was not supposed to work this…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Vendors, Instructional Materials, Computer Software
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gorman, Siobhan – Education Next, 2004
Tutoring services, known in the federal No Child Left Behind Act as "supplemental services," arguably represent the federal government's largest free-market experiment in education. In the rush to capture market share, more than 1,000 tutoring providers have signed up for the program. But market uncertainty, combined with differences in…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Marketing, Tutoring, School Districts
Chubb, John E. – Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2005
The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) is bolder than all previous federal education laws, setting ambitious goals for universal student achievement and authorizing severe remedies for schools not reaching them. In a nation where most youngsters are far from proficient in reading and mathematics and where innumerable efforts to boost learning levels…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Policy, Academic Standards
Bracey, Gerald W. – Education Policy Research Unit, 2005
This brief examines how No Child Left Behind (NCLB) dollars flow from the federal government through states and districts and into the coffers of companies, mostly for-profit companies. The brief makes the case that the law enriches many private companies and individuals, especially those close to President George W. Bush and his family. The brief…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Legislation, Educational Finance, Costs
Bracey, Gerald W. – Education Policy Research Unit, 2005
This brief examines how No Child Left Behind (NCLB) dollars flow from the federal government through states and districts and into the coffers of companies, mostly for-profit companies. The brief makes the case that the law enriches many private companies and individuals, especially those close to President George W. Bush and his family. The brief…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Legislation, Educational Finance, Costs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Peterson, Paul E. – Education Next, 2005
Afterschool programs, the heart of the supplemental service provision of No Child Left Behind (NCLB), take on increasing significance in the implementation of the historic federal law. As more and more schools fail to make their NCLB-mandated Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) goals, the demand for supplemental education services, such as tutoring,…
Descriptors: Educational Legislation, Program Effectiveness, Vendors, Public Policy