Generative AI is expansively used to create pornographic material. These images and practices are becoming a part of the sexual culture and have an influential impact on gender inequality. Many of the images are generated without the knowledge of the women in the material, and a considerable amount of them are child sexual abuse materials. GenAI and technology-facilitated violence have been in the scope of the United Nation's concern, and educational guidelines have been published in 2023. This paper sets out to conduct a feminist critical policy analysis on the most recent UN guidelines to investigate the discourses that dominate the response to GenAI. The analysis shows that the critique of GenAI often centres around the non-consensual nature of the generation and distribution of pornographic images. Furthermore, the discourse fails to connect AI-generated pornography to the issues of pornography in the first place, which gives a depoliticized and dehistoricized discourse about the problems of AI-generated pornography. The paper critiques the narrow focus on consent and explores feminist ways to approach the issues with AI-generated pornography. The paper also discusses implications for education and future policies.