Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Cognitive Processes | 6 |
| Content Analysis | 6 |
| Readability | 6 |
| Reading Comprehension | 4 |
| Difficulty Level | 2 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Measurement Techniques | 2 |
| Recall (Psychology) | 2 |
| Textbook Evaluation | 2 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Authors | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Advances in Language and… | 1 |
| Journal of Educational… | 1 |
| Journal of Experimental… | 1 |
| Reading Improvement | 1 |
| Teaching of Psychology | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 5 |
| Reports - Research | 4 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Malaysia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Radzi, Amizura Hanadi Mohd.; Aziz, Noor Hashima Abd. – Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 2013
This paper discusses a study on the aspects of content schemata in second language reading, focusing on two contemporary short stories, i.e. "A Quid of Sirih, A Bowl of Water" and "The Lottery." The study explores the cognitive processes of one UiTM Perlis degree level student, reflecting on his L2 reading processes. The…
Descriptors: Second Language Learning, Reading Processes, Schemata (Cognition), Cognitive Processes
Peer reviewedDuffy, Thomas M.; Kabance, Paula – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1982
The present findings imply that a readability formula is not an effective writing production criterion, even when the writer does not deliberately write to the formula. Comprehensibility of text might be better controlled through the proper use of the transformer concept (MacDonald-Ross and Waller). (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Adults, Cognitive Processes, Content Analysis, Difficulty Level
Miller, James R.; Kintsch, Walter – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1980
To support the view of readability as an interaction between a text and the reader's prose-processing capabilities, this article applies an extended and formalized version of the Kintch and van Dijk prose-processing model to 20 texts of varying readability. (Author/GSK)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Content Analysis, Higher Education, Models
Nevid, Jeffrey S.; Lampmann, Jodi L. – Teaching of Psychology, 2003
Eighty college students read textbook passages that either included marginal inserts to signal key concepts or did not include these inserts. Signaling key concepts enhanced performance on content quizzes overall and on subsets of items assessing signaled material. Performance was not affected on subsets of items for nonsignaled content. Students…
Descriptors: Tests, Computation, College Students, Reader Text Relationship
Peer reviewedLowe, A. J. – Reading Improvement, 1979
Explains how education majors try to learn to recognize thought unit sentences (ThUS's) and to gauge their difficulty. Shows examples of simple writing and discusses the task of writing ThUS's to match style and level of author. Gives a rationale for doing a readability analysis in this way. (FL)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Content Analysis, Discourse Analysis, Higher Education
Armbruster, Bonnie B.; Anderson, Thomas H. – 1981
Focusing on what authors can do to facilitate learning from content area textbooks, this report labels authors as "considerate," providing text that readers can understand with a minimum of cognitive effort, or as "inconsiderate," creating text that requires a conscientious, highly skilled effort if readers are to comprehend…
Descriptors: Authors, Check Lists, Cognitive Processes, Coherence

Direct link
