NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Eisenberg, Anne – 1977
Scientific discourse is difficult to read because of its lexical, syntactic, semantic, and logical features. This paper discusses each of those features, giving special attention to syntax, and suggests ways in which discourse analysis can be used to teach content reading in sciences and to rewrite scientific text for instructional purposes. Some…
Descriptors: Content Area Reading, Discourse Analysis, Readability, Reading Comprehension
Williams, Ray – 1980
Defining lexical familiarizations as devices by means of which an author gives a reader an understanding of newly introduced key lexis, this paper discusses familiarizations in content area textbooks. The various sections of the paper examine the following topics: (1) the forms taken by lexical familiarizations, including use of reader experience,…
Descriptors: Content Area Reading, Definitions, Language Patterns, Literary Devices
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Abrahamsen, Eileen P.; Shelton, Kathleen C. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1989
The effects of semantic and syntactic complexity on the reading comprehension of content-area prose were investigated among 92 adolescents with learning disabilities. Subjects who read passages that had been modified syntactically or both syntactically and semantically exhibited improved comprehension. Semantic modifications alone did not affect…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Comparative Analysis, Content Area Reading, Difficulty Level
Kossack, Sharon; And Others – 1980
Content area teachers should be aware of the five levels of vocabulary with which their students must cope. The five levels include standard words at the least complex level, transitional terms that have different meanings in the content area than in standard usage, technical terms specific to the subject area, changeable terms (similar to…
Descriptors: Content Area Reading, Higher Education, Readability, Secondary Education