NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)1
Since 2006 (last 20 years)1
Education Level
Elementary Education1
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Fry Readability Formula2
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 46 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Gallagher, Tiffany; Fazio, Xavier; Ciampa, Katia – Canadian Journal of Education, 2017
Science curriculum standards were mapped onto various texts (literacy readers, trade books, online articles). Statistical analyses highlighted the inconsistencies among readability formulae for Grades 2-6 levels of the standards. There was a lack of correlation among the readability measures, and also when comparing different text sources. Online…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Readability, Textbooks, Science Education
O'Hear, Michael F.; Ashton, Patrick J. – Forum for Reading, 1989
Examines the relationship of readability to usage of main idea clues in introductory texts in sociology and in English composition texts. Concludes that use of main idea clues provides a useful supplement to readability formulas in evaluating college textbooks. (SR)
Descriptors: Content Area Reading, Postsecondary Education, Readability, Readability Formulas
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Nelson, Joan – Journal of Reading, 1978
Suggests caution in using readability formulas in determining how to use a textbook for instruction and suggests other factors to consider. (MKM)
Descriptors: Content Area Reading, Elementary Secondary Education, Postsecondary Education, Readability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Krause, Kenneth G. – Journal of Reading, 1976
Provides a check list of evaluation criteria to supplement the SMOG readability formula in choosing new content area textbooks. (Author/KS)
Descriptors: Air Pollution, Check Lists, Content Area Reading, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Campbell, Anne – Journal of Reading, 1979
Explains why applying a readability formula to a content text is not enough to determine whether a student can read and understand the book. (MKM)
Descriptors: Content Area Reading, Mathematics Instruction, Readability, Readability Formulas
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Shymansky, James A.; Yore, Larry D. – School Science and Mathematics, 1979
Using the Fry Readability approach and a ten percent random sample of all reading materials from each grade level within a program, readability data were collected on six popular elementary science textbook series. Fry readability averages and ranges for the six programs surveyed are reported by grade level. (Author/MK)
Descriptors: Content Area Reading, Educational Research, Elementary Education, Elementary School Science
Edwards, Peter; Sofo, Frank – 1982
After reviewing criticisms of the exclusive use of readability formulas to evaluate text difficulty and describing successful efforts to broaden the traditional readability formula approach, this report presents a 20 item checklist for determining text comprehensibility based on four criteria: (1) specific objectives or outcomes expected from the…
Descriptors: Check Lists, Content Area Reading, Design, Difficulty Level
Giordano, Gerard – Academic Therapy, 1985
A four-factor approach to estimating the readability of content area texts for learning disabled students focuses on vocabulary, syntax, density, and format. (CL)
Descriptors: Content Area Reading, Elementary Secondary Education, Learning Disabilities, Readability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hayes, David – Social Studies, 1988
Describes how social studies teachers can help students interact with textbooks to promote better comprehension and retention of information. Suggests methods for linking existing knowledge to concepts in the text, for organizing information to encourage retention, and for making the expository style of texts more accessible. (LS)
Descriptors: Cloze Procedure, Cluster Grouping, Content Area Reading, Elementary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Giordano, Gerard – Clearing House, 1982
Offers a worksheet for evaluating the readability of content area textbooks. (RL)
Descriptors: Content Area Reading, Evaluation Criteria, Readability, Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McKinley, Nancy – Journal of Reading, 1990
Describes the attempt of the General Studies and Education Division of Laramie County Community College, Wyoming, to provide interested faculty members with readability information about their textbooks. Notes that faculty became more aware of the factors making their textbooks difficult for students. (RS)
Descriptors: College Environment, Content Area Reading, Readability, Reading Comprehension
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rodgers, Denis – Journal of Reading, 1974
Reports a random sampling of the frequency and types of connectives used in content area textbooks. The results suggest that a knowledge of connectives fosters comprehension in reading and speaking. (TO)
Descriptors: Content Area Reading, Readability, Reading Comprehension, Reading Materials
Symyrozum, Kenneth – Reading Impr, 1970
Descriptors: Content Area Reading, Grade 11, Readability, Reading Comprehension
State Univ. of New York, Albany. Two Year Coll. Student Development Center. – 1981
Intended as a resource of staff-tested activities for two-year college faculty, staff, and administrators, this manual is a compilation of representative materials from training workshops conducted, as a professional development project, to increase instructor skills and knowledge regarding intervention in reading deficiency of postsecondary…
Descriptors: Cloze Procedure, College Faculty, Content Area Reading, Faculty Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Levy, Stanley A.; Dixon, Melinda E. – Educational Research Quarterly, 1984
To increase student success in technical content area reading, the reading abilities of l,027 students and the readability levels of ll0 textbooks were evaluated at a California community college. Results indicated a significant portion of students were reading more than two years below the level of currently used texts. (Author/BS)
Descriptors: Content Area Reading, Instructional Improvement, Readability, Reading Ability
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4