Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Content Area Writing | 3 |
Formative Evaluation | 3 |
Writing Assignments | 3 |
Feedback (Response) | 2 |
Peer Evaluation | 2 |
Automation | 1 |
Calculus | 1 |
Case Studies | 1 |
College Faculty | 1 |
College Mathematics | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Alexander, R. Curby | 1 |
Baker, Kimberly M. | 1 |
Eaton, Carrie Diaz | 1 |
Ferster, Bill | 1 |
Hammond, Thomas C. | 1 |
Lyman, Hunt | 1 |
Wade, Stephanie | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
Maine | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Baker, Kimberly M. – Active Learning in Higher Education, 2016
Peer review is an established strategy for improving the quality of students' writing. This study moves beyond the focus on outcomes to assess the peer-review process. In particular, this study focuses on the timing of the peer review, a highly structured feedback form, and student writers' revisions after engaging in peer review. This study draws…
Descriptors: Writing Processes, Writing Improvement, Peer Evaluation, Feedback (Response)
Eaton, Carrie Diaz; Wade, Stephanie – PRIMUS, 2014
This paper describes a collaboration between a mathematician and a compositionist who developed a sequence of collaborative writing assignments for calculus. This sequence of developmentally appropriate assignments presents peer review as a collaborative process that promotes reflection, deepens understanding, and improves exposition. First, we…
Descriptors: College Mathematics, Content Area Writing, Cooperative Learning, Peer Evaluation
Ferster, Bill; Hammond, Thomas C.; Alexander, R. Curby; Lyman, Hunt – Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 2012
The hurried pace of the modern classroom does not permit formative feedback on writing assignments at the frequency or quality recommended by the research literature. One solution for increasing individual feedback to students is to incorporate some form of computer-generated assessment. This study explores the use of automated assessment of…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Scripts, Formative Evaluation, Essays