NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)0
Since 2006 (last 20 years)4
Audience
Researchers3
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 17 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Azzam, Tarek; Jacobson, Miriam R. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2013
This article explores the viability of online crowdsourcing for creating matched-comparison groups. This exploratory study compares survey results from a randomized control group to survey results from a matched-comparison group created from Amazon.com's MTurk crowdsourcing service to determine their comparability. Study findings indicate…
Descriptors: Matched Groups, Control Groups, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ji, Peter; DuBois, David L.; Flay, Brian R.; Brechling, Vanessa – Journal of School Health, 2008
Background: Recruiting schools into a matched-pair randomized control trial (MP-RCT) to evaluate the efficacy of a school-level prevention program presents challenges for researchers. We considered which of 2 procedures would be most effective for recruiting schools into the study and assigning them to conditions. In 1 procedure (recruit and…
Descriptors: Control Groups, Prevention, Recruitment, Sampling
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
de Anda, Diane – Children & Schools, 2007
This article discusses the difficulties in conducting intervention research or evaluating intervention programs in a school setting. In particular, the problems associated with randomization and obtaining control groups are examined. The use of quasi-experimental designs, specifically a paired comparison design using the individual as his or her…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Intervention, Research Design, Control Groups
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Marsh, Herbert W. – Journal of Experimental Education, 1998
Eight variations of a general matching design, matching program participants and a control group, were studied through simulation, for their effectiveness in evaluating programs for the gifted and talented. A regression-discontinuity design provided the best approach, with unbiased estimates of program effects. (SLD)
Descriptors: Control Groups, Gifted, Matched Groups, Program Evaluation
PDF pending restoration PDF pending restoration
Davis, Todd Mclin; McLean, James E. – 1982
A persistent problem in the evaluation of field-based projects is the lack of no-treatment comparison groups. Frequently, potential comparison groups are confounded by socioeconomic, racial, or other factors. Among the possible methods for dealing with this problem are various matching procedures, but they are cumbersome to use with multiple…
Descriptors: Cluster Analysis, Control Groups, Evaluation Methods, Matched Groups
Adair, John G.; And Others – 1987
A meta-analysis was conducted on 44 educational studies that used either a (labelled) Hawthorne control group, a manipulation of Hawthorne effects, or a group designed to control for the Hawthorne effect. The sample included published journal articles, ERIC documents or unpublished papers, and dissertations. The studies were coded on 20 variables,…
Descriptors: Control Groups, Educational Research, Effect Size, Experimental Groups
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Jenkinson, Josephine C. – International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 1989
This article discusses research design problems peculiar to work with intellectually disabled subjects, such as discrepancies in uses of control groups and mental age matching, definitions of subject groups and variability within and between subject groups. Suggestions for minimizing these problems are made and alternative methodologies offered.…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Control Groups, Elementary Secondary Education, Matched Groups
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Schmitt, John F.; Meline, Timothy J. – Journal of Communication Disorders, 1990
Ninety-two research reports involving specifically language-impaired subjects were reviewed. Analysis showed few consistent trends with respect to subject selection, subject description, and the number and types of control groups. The importance of more complete subject descriptions and matching criteria for control groups is discussed.…
Descriptors: Control Groups, Elementary Secondary Education, Experimental Groups, Language Handicaps
Rubin, Donald – 1972
Matching, randomization, random sampling, and other methods of controlling extraneous variation are discussed. The purpose was to specify the benefits of randomization in estimating causal effects of treatments. It is concluded that randomization should be employed whenever possible, but the use of carefully controlled nonrandomized data to…
Descriptors: Control Groups, Definitions, Evaluation Methods, Experimental Groups
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Slavin, Robert E. – Educational Leadership, 2003
Expresses the importance of scientifically based research in education reform and explains how to judge the validity of educational research. Describes control groups, randomized and matched experiments, statistical educational significance, sample size, and the difference between scientifically based and rigorously evaluated research. (Contains…
Descriptors: Control Groups, Data Interpretation, Educational Research, Elementary Secondary Education
Crain, Robert L.; York, Robert L. – 1974
The Evaluation of the Emergency School Assistance Program (ESAP) for the 1971-72 school year is the first application of full-blown experimental design with randomized experimental and control cases in a federal evaluation of a large scale program. It is also one of the very few evaluations which has shown that federal programs can raise tested…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Control Groups, Data Analysis, Educational Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Grossman, Jean; Tierney, Joseph P. – Evaluation Review, 1993
Evidence is presented that strengthens the argument against comparison group research strategies. Results from a study of youth attitudes related to the California Conservation Corps involving 528 participants and 668 comparisons indicate that the comparison group may not adequately represent the nontreatment state. (SLD)
Descriptors: Attitudes, Comparative Analysis, Control Groups, Experimental Groups
Vermillion, James E. – 1980
The presence of artifactual bias in analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and in matching nonequivalent control group (NECG) designs was empirically investigated. The data set was obtained from a study of the effects of a television program on children from three day care centers in Mexico in which the subjects had been randomly selected within centers.…
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Control Groups, Error of Measurement, Experimental Groups
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Skipper, James K., Jr.; And Others – Evaluation Practice, 1989
An evaluation of an experimental problem-based medical education curriculum used with 18 first-year students at the Bowman Gray Medical School of Wake Forest University is discussed. The study, which included a matched group of students experiencing a traditional curriculum, provides insights into design problems in such evaluations. (TJH)
Descriptors: College Curriculum, Control Groups, Curriculum Development, Curriculum Evaluation
Tallmadge, G. Kasten – 1991
Problems with conducting randomized field experiments in education are explored. Focus is on problems encountered while evaluating a group of dropout prevention projects. Project planners were asked to manipulate the subject eligibility criteria until they identified as eligible three to four times as many students as they could serve. They were…
Descriptors: Attrition (Research Studies), Control Groups, Dropout Programs, Educational Experiments
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2