Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 5 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Controversial Issues (Course… | 6 |
Information Sources | 4 |
College Students | 3 |
Conflict | 3 |
Reading Comprehension | 3 |
Credibility | 2 |
Essays | 2 |
Foreign Countries | 2 |
Internet | 2 |
Metacognition | 2 |
Prior Learning | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Reading and Writing: An… | 3 |
Educational Psychologist | 1 |
Instructional Science: An… | 1 |
Journal of Educational… | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Reports - Research | 5 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 4 |
Postsecondary Education | 4 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Grade 6 | 1 |
Intermediate Grades | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Delgado, Pablo; Stang Lund, Elisabeth; Salmerón, Ladislao; Bråten, Ivar – Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2020
This study investigated whether accessing conflicting claims in other documents by means of hyperlinks embedded within currently read documents may facilitate conflict detection and source-content integration. Norwegian undergraduates (n = 85) read multiple conflicting documents on a controversial health-related issue, with half of the conflicting…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Undergraduate Students, Hypermedia, Prompting
Braasch, Jason L. G.; Haverkamp, Ymkje E.; Latini, Natalia; Shaw, Sabriyya; Arshad, Muhammad Safwan; Bråten, Ivar – Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2022
The current study examined the extent to which sixth grade students used their pre-existing topic beliefs to guide comprehension of semantic ideas within multiple conflicting texts, and the sources providing them. Adolescents completed an inventory assessing their pre-reading topic beliefs one week prior to the study. During the study, students…
Descriptors: Reading Comprehension, Metacognition, Reading Processes, Grade 6
Kammerer, Yvonne; Gottschling, Steffen; Bråten, Ivar – Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2021
This study explored relationships between Internet-specific justification beliefs and source evaluation and corroboration during Web search. Fifty university students completed the Internet-Specific Epistemic Justification Inventory (ISEJ), which targeted beliefs concerning the justification of Internet-based knowledge claims about natural science…
Descriptors: Beliefs, Internet, Web Sites, Navigation (Information Systems)
Bråten, Ivar; Muis, Krista R.; Reznitskaya, Alina – Educational Psychologist, 2017
In this article, we argue that teachers' epistemic cognition, in particular their thinking about epistemic aims and reliable processes for achieving those aims, may impact students' understanding of complex, controversial issues. This is because teachers' epistemic cognition may facilitate or constrain their implementation of instruction aiming to…
Descriptors: Epistemology, Controversial Issues (Course Content), Classroom Communication, Discussion (Teaching Technique)
Bråten, Ivar; Strømsø, Helge I.; Andreassen, Rune – Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2016
The present study investigated the extent to which the text factors of source salience and emphasis on risk might influence readers' attention to and use of source information when reading single documents to make behavioral decisions on controversial health-related issues. Participants (n = 259), who were attending different bachelor-level…
Descriptors: College Students, Reading Comprehension, Information Sources, Professional Education
Anmarkrud, Øistein; McCrudden, Matthew T.; Bråten, Ivar; Strømsø, Helge I. – Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2013
We explored readers' judgments of text relevance and strategy use while they read about a controversial scientific issue in multiple conflicting documents using a think-aloud methodology and had them write a short essay after reading. Participants were university-level students. There were three main findings. First, readers discriminated…
Descriptors: College Students, Protocol Analysis, Scientific and Technical Information, Science Materials