Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
Source
| Educational Technology… | 6 |
Author
| Klein, James D. | 2 |
| Aldemir, Tugce | 1 |
| Arcidiacono, Caterina | 1 |
| Borge, Marcela | 1 |
| Brewer, Susan | 1 |
| Carnevale, Stefania | 1 |
| Di Napoli, Immacolata | 1 |
| Doran, Martha S. | 1 |
| Esposito, Francesca | 1 |
| Kapur, Manu | 1 |
| Kinzer, Charles K. | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 6 |
| Reports - Research | 5 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 4 |
| Postsecondary Education | 4 |
| Grade 6 | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Italy | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkBorge, Marcela; Aldemir, Tugce; Xia, Yu – Educational Technology Research and Development, 2022
We examined the utility of a technologically enhanced collective regulation system for improving students' collaborative sense-making processes, i.e., discussion quality, over time. Participants were 27 online undergraduate students enrolled in an introductory information science course. Students were divided into teams tasked with carrying out…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Science Instruction, Synchronous Communication, Computer Mediated Communication
Carnevale, Stefania; Di Napoli, Immacolata; Esposito, Francesca; Arcidiacono, Caterina – Educational Technology Research and Development, 2021
Drawingvoice 2.0 is an instructional method of collaborative pencil and paper drawing to use in the school classroom, followed by Facebook interaction on the drawing produced in class. It is based on a participatory and meta reflective approach, explicitly aimed at deconstructing, negotiating, and reconstructing the meaning that students attribute…
Descriptors: Educational Technology, Design, Social Media, Web 2.0 Technologies
Kwon, Kyungbin; Shin, Suhkyung; Park, Su Jin – Educational Technology Research and Development, 2018
The current experimental study examined the effects of graphic organizers in a collaborative learning context where students constructed knowledge during online discussions. As the results could vary depending on how students interacted with the graphic organizers, this study compared two different approaches: instructor-provided versus…
Descriptors: Instructional Materials, Computer Mediated Communication, Group Discussion, Comparative Analysis
Kapur, Manu; Kinzer, Charles K. – Educational Technology Research and Development, 2007
This study investigated the effect of well- vs. ill-structured problem types on: (a) group interactional activity, (b) evolution of group participation inequities, (c) group discussion quality, and (d) group performance in a synchronous, computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment. Participants were 60 11th-grade science students…
Descriptors: Group Discussion, Problem Solving, Cooperative Learning, Problem Based Learning
Peer reviewedKlein, James D.; Doran, Martha S. – Educational Technology Research and Development, 1999
Investigates the effects of implementing individual and small-group learning structures with a computer simulation in college accounting. Results indicate students working alone expressed significantly more continuing motivation for their learning structure than did partnered students; students using extensive small-group structure exhibited…
Descriptors: Accounting, Computer Simulation, Cooperative Learning, Group Discussion
Brewer, Susan; Klein, James D. – Educational Technology Research and Development, 2006
In this study, we investigated the effect of type of positive interdependence (roles, rewards, roles-plus-rewards, or no structure) and affiliation motives (high vs. low) in an asynchronous, collaborative learning environment. College reentry students worked together in small, fully online discussion groups that lasted for seven days. Results…
Descriptors: Student Attitudes, Discussion Groups, Cooperative Learning, Correlation
