Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Cooperative Learning | 2 |
| Group Testing | 2 |
| Knowledge Level | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Alternative Assessment | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Comparative Testing | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Genetics | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Dahlstrom, Orjan | 1 |
| Desrochers, Marcie N. | 1 |
| Fink, Herbert C. | 1 |
| Kimmerling, Joe | 1 |
| Thomas, Andrea | 1 |
| Tung, Wendy | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| New York | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkDahlstrom, Orjan – Educational Research and Evaluation, 2012
Collaborative testing has been suggested to serve as a good learning activity, for example, compared to individual testing. The aim of the present study was to measure learning at different levels of knowledge during a collaborative final exam in a course in basic methods and statistical procedures. Results on pre- and post-tests taken…
Descriptors: Cooperative Learning, Group Testing, Knowledge Level, College Students
Download full textDesrochers, Marcie N.; Fink, Herbert C.; Thomas, Andrea; Kimmerling, Joe; Tung, Wendy – International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 2007
Alternatives to a solitary testing format can involve students working in teams to arrive at the correct answer. We compared two group assessment methods, cooperative and competitive, to a solitary testing approach. In most comparisons examining the undergraduate respondents' (N = 77) performance, the two group-testing methods were equivalent.…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Alternative Assessment, Group Testing
