NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Ciumageanu, Mugur; Sfetcu, Raluca; Suditu, Florina – Journal of Educational Sciences, 2020
Adolescence is by definition an "age of risk", irrelevant if you substantiate such a claim experientially or empirically. Mid-adolescence is the period where the processes of both neural and socio-emotional maturation are linked with an increase in both exploratory and health-risk behaviors. The present study, using a cross-sectional…
Descriptors: Self Concept, Interpersonal Relationship, Health Behavior, Risk
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wright, Aidan G. C.; Pincus, Aaron L.; Hopwood, Christopher J.; Thomas, Katherine M.; Markon, Kristian E.; Krueger, Robert F. – Assessment, 2012
The proposed changes to the personality disorder section of the "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders" (5th ed.) places an increased focus on interpersonal impairment as one of the defining features of personality psychopathology. In addition, a proposed trait model has been offered to provide a means of capturing…
Descriptors: Personality Traits, Personality Problems, Psychopathology, Interpersonal Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hess, Timothy R.; Rohlfing, Jessica E.; Hardy, Amanda O.; Glidden-Tracey, Cynthia; Tracey, Terence J. G. – Assessment, 2010
This study examined whether the Outcome Questionnaire-45 (OQ) and its subscales assessed unique interpersonal distress. The Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP) was used to assess discriminant validity for unique interpersonal distress. Participants (N = 121) were recruited from a southwestern university counselor training center. Significant…
Descriptors: Questionnaires, Interpersonal Relationship, Psychological Patterns, Problems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Vanheule, Stijn; Desmet, Mattias; Rosseel, Yves – Psychological Assessment, 2006
In this article, the authors study the factorial structure of 2 versions (64 items and 32 items) of the Dutch translation of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP; L. M. Horowitz, L. E. Alden, J. S. Wiggins, & A. L. Pincus, 2000) in both a clinical sample (n = 382) and a student sample (n = 287). First, the authors test whether both…
Descriptors: Factor Structure, Interpersonal Relationship, Sample Size, Measures (Individuals)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Monsen, Jon T.; Hagtvet, Knut A.; Havik, Odd E.; Eilertsen, Dag E. – Psychological Assessment, 2006
This study assessed the construct validity of the circumplex model of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP-C) in Norwegian clinical and nonclinical samples. Structure was examined by evaluating the fit of the circumplex model to data obtained by the IIP-C. Observer-rated personality disorder criteria (DSM-IV, Axis II) were used as external…
Descriptors: Personality Problems, Correlation, Interpersonal Relationship, Construct Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Tracey, Terence J. G.; And Others – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1996
The relation of the general factor of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP) to several response set and personality measures and the circumplex structure was studied with 105 and 1,093 undergraduates. Results support the general factor of the IIP as having a substantial nonbiasing interpretation and indicative of general interpersonal…
Descriptors: Correlation, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Higher Education