Descriptor
| Correlation | 2 |
| Sex Differences | 2 |
| Test Reliability | 2 |
| Test Validity | 2 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Age Differences | 1 |
| Analysis of Variance | 1 |
| Cognitive Style | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Educational Research | 1 |
| Elementary School Students | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Perceptual and Motor Skills | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Rod and Frame Test | 2 |
| Group Embedded Figures Test | 1 |
| Lorge Thorndike Intelligence… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedAllen, Mary J.; And Others – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1982
Adults took the Rod and Frame, Portable Rod and Frame, and Embedded Figures Tests. Absolute and algebraic frame-effect scores were more reliable and valid than rod-effect algebraic scores. Correlations with the Embedded Figures Test were so low that the interchangeability of these field articulation measures is questionable. (Author/RD)
Descriptors: Adults, Cognitive Style, Correlation, Measurement Techniques
Download full textBusch, John Christian; Simon, Lawrence H. – 1972
The rod and frame performance of 70 children, 5 to 7 years of age, with respect to sex and age differences, reliability, and its relationship to general intelligence, was investigated. The rod and frame test was administered individually and again following a period of 35 to 69 days, at which time the Lorge Thorndike Intelligence Test, form 1A,…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Analysis of Variance, Comparative Analysis, Correlation
