Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 5 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Correlation | 6 |
Intervals | 6 |
Meta Analysis | 5 |
Simulation | 3 |
Accuracy | 2 |
Comparative Analysis | 2 |
Effect Size | 2 |
Evaluation Methods | 2 |
Generalization | 2 |
Randomized Controlled Trials | 2 |
Regression (Statistics) | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Research Synthesis Methods | 6 |
Author
Bakbergenuly, Ilyas | 1 |
Cappelleri, Joseph C. | 1 |
Daly, Caitlin | 1 |
Gurung, Tara | 1 |
Harari, Ofir | 1 |
Heeg, Bart | 1 |
Hoaglin, David C. | 1 |
Hoyer, Annika | 1 |
Jacobs, Perke | 1 |
Kulinskaya, Elena | 1 |
Kuss, Oliver | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Reports - Research | 5 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Timo Gnambs; Ulrich Schroeders – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
Meta-analyses of treatment effects in randomized control trials are often faced with the problem of missing information required to calculate effect sizes and their sampling variances. Particularly, correlations between pre- and posttest scores are frequently not available. As an ad-hoc solution, researchers impute a constant value for the missing…
Descriptors: Accuracy, Meta Analysis, Randomized Controlled Trials, Effect Size
Harari, Ofir; Soltanifar, Mohsen; Cappelleri, Joseph C.; Verhoek, Andre; Ouwens, Mario; Daly, Caitlin; Heeg, Bart – Research Synthesis Methods, 2023
Effect modification (EM) may cause bias in network meta-analysis (NMA). Existing population adjustment NMA methods use individual patient data to adjust for EM but disregard available subgroup information from aggregated data in the evidence network. Additionally, these methods often rely on the shared effect modification (SEM) assumption. In this…
Descriptors: Networks, Network Analysis, Meta Analysis, Evaluation Methods
Bakbergenuly, Ilyas; Hoaglin, David C.; Kulinskaya, Elena – Research Synthesis Methods, 2020
In random-effects meta-analysis the between-study variance ([tau][superscript 2]) has a key role in assessing heterogeneity of study-level estimates and combining them to estimate an overall effect. For odds ratios the most common methods suffer from bias in estimating [tau][superscript 2] and the overall effect and produce confidence intervals…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Statistical Bias, Intervals, Sample Size
Hoyer, Annika; Kuss, Oliver – Research Synthesis Methods, 2019
Diagnostic test accuracy studies frequently report on sensitivities and specificities for more than one threshold of the diagnostic test under study. Although it is obvious that the information from all thresholds should be used for a meta-analysis, in practice, frequently, only a single pair of sensitivity and specificity is selected. To overcome…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Diagnostic Tests, Correlation, Intervals
Jacobs, Perke; Viechtbauer, Wolfgang – Research Synthesis Methods, 2017
Meta-analyses are often used to synthesize the findings of studies examining the correlational relationship between two continuous variables. When only dichotomous measurements are available for one of the two variables, the biserial correlation coefficient can be used to estimate the product-moment correlation between the two underlying…
Descriptors: Sampling, Correlation, Meta Analysis, Measurement
Robertson, Clare; Ramsay, Craig; Gurung, Tara; Mowatt, Graham; Pickard, Robert; Sharma, Pawana – Research Synthesis Methods, 2014
We describe our experience of using a modified version of the Cochrane risk of bias (RoB) tool for randomised and non-randomised comparative studies. Objectives: (1) To assess time to complete RoB assessment; (2) To assess inter-rater agreement; and (3) To explore the association between RoB and treatment effect size. Methods: Cochrane risk of…
Descriptors: Risk, Randomized Controlled Trials, Research Design, Comparative Analysis