Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Correlation | 3 |
Differences | 3 |
Hypothesis Testing | 3 |
Comparative Analysis | 2 |
Effect Size | 2 |
Error of Measurement | 2 |
Analysis of Variance | 1 |
Children | 1 |
Computation | 1 |
Factor Analysis | 1 |
Foreign Countries | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Ferron, John M. | 1 |
Hummel, Thomas J. | 1 |
Johnston, Charles B. | 1 |
Levin, Joel R. | 1 |
Marcoulides, George A. | 1 |
Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J. | 1 |
Raykov, Tenko | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Researchers | 1 |
Location
Israel | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Child Behavior Checklist | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J.; Levin, Joel R.; Ferron, John M. – Journal of Experimental Education, 2011
Building on previous arguments for why educational researchers should not provide effect-size estimates in the face of statistically nonsignificant outcomes (Robinson & Levin, 1997), Onwuegbuzie and Levin (2005) proposed a 3-step statistical approach for assessing group differences when multiple outcome measures are individually analyzed…
Descriptors: Hypothesis Testing, Statistical Analysis, Effect Size, Probability
Raykov, Tenko; Marcoulides, George A. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2010
A latent variable modeling approach for examining population similarities and differences in observed variable relationship and mean indexes in incomplete data sets is discussed. The method is based on the full information maximum likelihood procedure of model fitting and parameter estimation. The procedure can be employed to test group identities…
Descriptors: Models, Comparative Analysis, Groups, Maximum Likelihood Statistics
Hummel, Thomas J.; Johnston, Charles B. – 1986
This study investigated seven methods for analyzing multivariate group differences. Bonferroni t statistics, multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) followed by analysis of variance (ANOVA), and five other methods were studied using Monte Carlo methods. Methods were compared with respect to (1) experimentwise error rate; (2) power; (3) number…
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Comparative Analysis, Correlation, Differences