Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 4 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 6 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 10 |
Descriptor
Correlation | 10 |
Evaluation Methods | 10 |
Reputation | 10 |
Institutional Characteristics | 7 |
Institutional Evaluation | 7 |
Universities | 5 |
Periodicals | 4 |
Comparative Analysis | 3 |
Decision Making | 3 |
Foreign Countries | 3 |
Scores | 3 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Büsra Ayan | 1 |
Ding, Chuanfu | 1 |
Dragan Pamucar | 1 |
Faraoni, Nina | 1 |
Hoagland, Steven R. | 1 |
Jalbert, Terrance | 1 |
Kaycheng, Soh | 1 |
Kayyali, Mustafa | 1 |
Kopatz, Susanne | 1 |
Krzeski, Jakub | 1 |
Kulczycki, Emanuel | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 8 |
Reports - Research | 7 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 8 |
Postsecondary Education | 7 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
ACT Assessment | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Seda Abacioglu; Büsra Ayan; Dragan Pamucar – Innovative Higher Education, 2025
This study investigates the evolving landscape of green universities by analyzing and comparing rankings from 2018 to 2022. It expands beyond the single score offered by the UI GreenMetric, employing Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) techniques to evaluate universities from diverse perspectives. Focusing on the top 50 universities from 2022,…
Descriptors: Universities, Comparative Education, Comparative Analysis, Reputation
Krzeski, Jakub; Szadkowski, Krystian; Kulczycki, Emanuel – Research Evaluation, 2022
The study investigates the process of creating evaluative homogeneity within a performance-based research funding system. It does so in reference to the experience of creating a national journal ranking in Poland in 2019. It refers to the cases of two disciplines: biology and history. The use of this case is justified by its unique character, that…
Descriptors: Periodicals, Reputation, Financial Support, Performance Based Assessment
Kayyali, Mustafa – Online Submission, 2023
University rankings have a growing impact on how people view the academic excellence of higher education. The complicated relationship between rankings and academic excellence is explored in this essay along with how it may affect higher education policy and practice. The importance of rankings and their influence on institutional decision-making…
Descriptors: Correlation, Reputation, Educational Quality, Institutional Characteristics
Luque-Martínez, Teodoro; Faraoni, Nina – Studies in Higher Education, 2020
University rankings have proliferated in recent years and have been diverse, with a variety of profiles. This paper deals with the task of obtaining one single summarized ranking based on a selection of the most widely known rankings, in short, a meta-ranking. Five of the best-known rankings were selected and a database compiled with the major…
Descriptors: Universities, Institutional Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Databases
Scruggs, Richard; McDermott, Paul A.; Qiao, Xin – Innovative Higher Education, 2019
Research impact is very important in academia. This study explored the research impact of faculty in doctoral higher education programs through the use of Hirsch's "h" index as measured by Google Scholar results. Characteristics of the "h" index in this field are discussed, and norms are offered for professors of different…
Descriptors: Faculty Publishing, Reputation, Institutional Characteristics, College Faculty
Powers, Jeanne M. – National Education Policy Center, 2023
School ratings are a ubiquitous feature of the U.S. educational system. Alongside state-mandated measures of school performance, non-state organizations such as GreatSchools.org and Niche have created consumer-oriented systems of school ratings that draw on publicly available information about schools. Claiming the purpose of their rating systems…
Descriptors: Institutional Evaluation, Equal Education, Race, Ethnicity
Kaycheng, Soh – Higher Education Quarterly, 2015
World university ranking systems used the weight-and-sum approach to combined indicator scores into overall scores on which the universities are then ranked. This approach assumes that the indicators all independently contribute to the overall score in the specified proportions. In reality, this assumption is doubtful as the indicators tend to…
Descriptors: Universities, Reputation, Scores, Educational Indicators
Kopatz, Susanne; Pilz, Matthias – International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 2015
This paper analyses the returns to education of specific occupations in Canada. The purpose is to scrutinize whether and in how far academic and vocational education do differ in monetary benefits regarding individual returns. Therefore, two different methodologies of calculation are used to compute the concrete returns to education. As a result…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Outcomes of Education, Comparative Analysis, College Graduates
Ding, Chuanfu; Jalbert, Terrance; Landry, Steven P. – College Teaching Methods & Styles Journal, 2007
This paper examines the relationship between university ranks and outcome measurements. Many students select the university that they will attend based on these rankings In this paper the rankings conducted by two studies are examined. U.S. News and World Report rankings are based upon measures of the quality of input, retention while in school…
Descriptors: Reputation, Correlation, Universities, Periodicals
Hoagland, Steven R. – Online Submission, 2006
Institutional accountability for performance and quality is an evolving topic with immeasurable appeal. Data and sources are abundant, but validated measures and meaningful information are scarce. While pursuing an approach centered on construct validity, this study transforms complex data into useful information. Correlation analysis reveals…
Descriptors: Graduation Rate, Reputation, Consumer Education, Graduation