Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Author
| Attali, Yigal | 1 |
| Hawthorn, John | 1 |
| Katsiyannis, Antonis | 1 |
| Losinki, Mickey | 1 |
| Nering, Michael L., Ed. | 1 |
| Ostini, Remo, Ed. | 1 |
| Powers, Don | 1 |
| Stegall, Joanna | 1 |
| Wang, Qiu | 1 |
| Zhang, Dake | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Books | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 3 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Practitioners | 1 |
| Researchers | 1 |
| Students | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Graduate Record Examinations | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkZhang, Dake; Wang, Qiu; Stegall, Joanna; Losinki, Mickey; Katsiyannis, Antonis – Remedial and Special Education, 2018
Although there have been numerous instruments for assessing teacher efficacy in teaching general education students, there is a need to develop and validate an instrument that specifically assesses teachers' efficacy in teaching students with disabilities. This study constructed and evaluated the psychometric properties of the "Student…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Teacher Competency Testing, Self Concept Measures, Self Efficacy
Nering, Michael L., Ed.; Ostini, Remo, Ed. – Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2010
This comprehensive "Handbook" focuses on the most used polytomous item response theory (IRT) models. These models help us understand the interaction between examinees and test questions where the questions have various response categories. The book reviews all of the major models and includes discussions about how and where the models…
Descriptors: Guides, Item Response Theory, Test Items, Correlation
Download full textAttali, Yigal; Powers, Don; Hawthorn, John – ETS Research Report Series, 2008
Registered examinees for the GRE® General Test answered open-ended sentence-completion items. For half of the items, participants received immediate feedback on the correctness of their answers and up to two opportunities to revise their answers. A significant feedback-and-revision effect was found. Participants were able to correct many of their…
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Graduate Study, Sentences, Psychometrics
