NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Back to results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
ERIC Number: EJ1403670
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2023
Pages: 19
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-2159-0281
EISSN: EISSN-2159-029X
Available Date: N/A
Collegiate Athletes' Motivational Styles and Athlete Satisfaction in Team Sports
Washington, Dalonie
Journal of Instructional Research, v12 p50-67 2023
The purpose of this quantitative correlational study was to examine if and to what extent there is a correlation between athletes' motivational styles (intrinsic, external, identified, introjected, integrated, and amotivated) and the individual performance construct of athletes' satisfaction within a two-year university system in the Western United States. The theoretical framework for assessing the correlation between athletes' motivational styles and satisfaction is self-determination theory (SDT). Six research questions addressed correlations between athletes' motivational styles of intrinsic, external, identified, introjected, integrated, and amotivated, and the individual performance construct of athletes' satisfaction. The sample included 28 university student-athletes who play team sports within a two-year university system in the Western United States. The dataset included Sport Motivation Scale (SMS-II) and Athlete Satisfaction Questionnaire (ASQ) instruments, which collected data within a single online system: Survey Hero. Due to COVID-19, the research study site was shut prematurely. Therefore, a low number of responses was collected from participants. A Kendall's tau-b correlational analysis showed significant evidence to accept the null hypothesis and conclude there was no association between intrinsic tb = 0.262, external tb = -0.012, identified tb = 0.114, introjected tb = 0.23, integrated tb = 0.068, and amotivated tb = 0.075 motivation and athletes' satisfaction (M = 14.89; SD = 4.59). A post hoc analysis was then performed on each research question and concluded that there is at least a 90.7% chance of committing a type II error. The results may not fit the general population across other states.
Center for Innovation in Research and Teaching at Grand Canyon University. 3300 West Camelback Road, Phoenix, AZ 85017. Tel: 602-639-6729; e-mail: cirt@gcu.edu; Web site: http://www.instructionalresearch.com
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education; Postsecondary Education; Two Year Colleges
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A
Author Affiliations: N/A