NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 9 results Save | Export
Shaw, Ralph R. – American Libraries, 1972
Descriptors: Copyrights, Court Litigation, Libraries, Reprography
North, William – American Libraries, 1972
This article contains a call for active participation by all segments of the library and educational community in the Williams and Wilkins controversy and in the effort to achieve appropriate copyright revision. (Author)
Descriptors: Copyrights, Court Litigation, Libraries, Reprography
Court of Claims, Washington, DC. – 1973
Plaintiff Williams & Wilkins Company, a medical publisher, charges that the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, through the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Library of Medicine (NLM), has infringed plaintiff's copyrights in certain of its medical journals by making unauthorized photocopies of articles from those…
Descriptors: Copyrights, Court Litigation, Federal Courts, Libraries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Spreitzer, Francis F. – Library Resources and Technical Services, 1973
The copyright issue and its ramifications for libraries are discussed. The article is broken down into six sections: general review; full-size copying; microform materials; microform equipment; audiovision and facsimile transmission; and, publications, research and professional activities. (176 references) (SM)
Descriptors: Audiovisual Communications, Copyrights, Court Litigation, Facsimile Transmission
Sword, Larry F. – Kentucky Law Journal, 1974
Examines the issues involved in Williams and Wilkins Co. v. United States in which a Court of Claims reversed the trial commissioner's decision that a library's distributing photocopied reprints of medical journal articles was copyright infringement. Argues that publishers of medical journals must be granted copyright protection against library…
Descriptors: Copyrights, Court Litigation, Laws, Libraries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Nimmer, Melville B. – UCLA Law Review, 1975
The cases of Williams and Wilkins Co. v. United States and Duchess Music Corp. v. Stern are discussed as examples of unfair court interpretation of copyright law. The first concerns photocopying by NIH and the National Library of Medicine; the second, protection of rights in sound recordings. For journal availability see HE 508 824. (LBH)
Descriptors: Audiodisc Recordings, Copyrights, Court Litigation, Legal Responsibility
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Blackwell, Thomas E. – Journal of College and University Law, 1974
The issue of library photocopying of copyrighted materials is examined from a historical perspective and with reference to proposed legislative revisions including the establishment of a compulsory licensing for reproduction. The author proposes that publishers be awarded compensation from the federal government for granting educational use of…
Descriptors: Copyrights, Court Litigation, Federal Legislation, Government Role
American Library Association, Chicago, IL. – 1974
This booklet is an attempt to provide librarians with a short summary of the arguments in favor of library photocopying, combined with a status report on how these arguments have fared in the courts and in the United States Congress. Following an analysis of the issues involved, the case of Williams and Wilkins v. the United States is discussed,…
Descriptors: Copyrights, Court Litigation, Federal Legislation, Information Dissemination
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Crews, Kenneth D. – Journal of Government Information, 1995
Summarizes recent developments in copyright law, with a focus on their consequences for users in colleges, universities, and libraries. Highlights include the concept of fair use; library reproduction rights; recent court cases and legislation; and future copyright concerns, including fair use of computer software and electronic text, and license…
Descriptors: Computer Software, Copyrights, Court Litigation, Electronic Text