Descriptor
Source
Science, Technology, & Human… | 13 |
Author
Cracraft, Joel | 1 |
Gilkey, Langdon | 1 |
Herlihy, Mark E. | 1 |
Holtzman, Eric | 1 |
Kerr, Peggy L. | 1 |
Klasfeld, David | 1 |
Nelkin, Dorothy | 1 |
Ruse, Michael | 1 |
Sturm, Susan P. | 1 |
Thomas, William A., Ed. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 13 |
Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 9 |
Reports - General | 6 |
Opinion Papers | 4 |
Reference Materials -… | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Science, Technology, & Human Values, 1982
An alphabetical list of 44 references (books and articles) on various aspects of creationism, creationism-evolution controversy, and Darwinism is presented. (JN)
Descriptors: Controversial Issues (Course Content), Creationism, Elementary School Science, Elementary Secondary Education

Science, Technology, & Human Values, 1982
Presents the full text of Arkansas Act 590 (1981) requiring balanced treatment of creationism and evolution in public schools of this state. Includes, among others, requirements for balanced treatment, prohibition against religious instruction, requirements for nondiscrimination, definitions of "creation-science" and…
Descriptors: Controversial Issues (Course Content), Creationism, Elementary School Science, Elementary Secondary Education

Cracraft, Joel – Science, Technology, & Human Values, 1982
Examines proposition that creationism is legitimate science, including philosophical basis of that claim and methods used to discredit contemporary scientific thought. Discusses creationist's arguments against scientific findings related to second law of thermodynamics, improbability of evolution, earth's age, geological record, fossil transitions…
Descriptors: Controversial Issues (Course Content), Creationism, Elementary School Science, Elementary Secondary Education

Herlihy, Mark E. – Science, Technology, & Human Values, 1982
Focusing on Judge William R. Overton's decision that Arkansas Law 590 (balanced treatment of creationism/evolution) is unconstitutional, explains the legal significance of some of the apparently nonlegal elements of the judge's opinion and discusses features of the strategies employed in the litigation of such issues. (Author/JN)
Descriptors: Controversial Issues (Course Content), Court Litigation, Creationism, Elementary School Science

Ruse, Michael – Science, Technology, & Human Values, 1982
Discusses salient characteristics of scientific enterprise including laws (natural regularities), explanation and prediction, testability, confirmation, and falsifiability, tentativeness, and professional integrity. Argues that "creation-science" lacks each of these essential characteristics. (JN)
Descriptors: Controversial Issues (Course Content), Creationism, Elementary School Science, Elementary Secondary Education

Holtzman, Eric; Klasfeld, David – Science, Technology, & Human Values, 1982
Discusses various legal and scientific issues related to the McLean v. Arkansas 590 (balanced treatment of creationism/evolution), including nature of "creation-science," responses from scientists and lawyers, focus of the plaintiff's case (anticreationism), nature of science, and one example illustrating creationist tendency to use…
Descriptors: Controversial Issues (Course Content), Court Litigation, Creationism, Elementary School Science

Science, Technology, & Human Values, 1982
Presents and analyzes a bill modeled after Arkansas 590 (balanced treatment of creationism/evolution). Cites wording from the original bill and modifications in the new bill. Indicates that most of the substantial differences are found in the "Definitions" section. (JN)
Descriptors: Controversial Issues (Course Content), Court Litigation, Creationism, Elementary School Science

Science, Technology, & Human Values, 1982
Excerpts from the opinions of the Attorney General of Maryland on the constitutionality of this state's House Bill 1078 (balanced presentation of creationism/evolution) are presented. Indicates that the bill has as its purpose and effect the advancement of religion and would foster an excessive governmental entanglement with religion. (Author/JN)
Descriptors: Controversial Issues (Course Content), Creationism, Elementary School Science, Elementary Secondary Education

Sturm, Susan P. – Science, Technology, & Human Values, 1982
Argues that the fight against creationism in public schools is essential to the preservation of First Amendment rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. Discusses how creationists, to avoid religious issues, are presenting the "creation-science" (pseudoscience) issue in terms of academic freedom and censorship. (Author/JN)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Censorship, Controversial Issues (Course Content), Creationism

Nelkin, Dorothy – Science, Technology, & Human Values, 1982
Traces origins of present-day creationists from their 19th-century fundamentalist beginnings, focusing on past and current objections to the teaching of evolution and efforts to require the teaching of creationism in public schools. Discusses creationist arguments and strategies to accomplish their aims. (JN)
Descriptors: Controversial Issues (Course Content), Court Litigation, Creationism, Elementary School Science

Kerr, Peggy L. – Science, Technology, & Human Values, 1982
Describes contributions and efforts of New York law firm (Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher, Flom) personnel in developing plaintiff's case in McLean v. Arkansas 590 (balanced treatment of creationism/evolution). Discusses aspects of "Pro Bono Publico" (unpaid public interest service) endeavors in general and those related to this law firm in…
Descriptors: Controversial Issues (Course Content), Court Litigation, Creationism, Elementary School Science

Gilkey, Langdon – Science, Technology, & Human Values, 1982
Discusses basic errors (confusions) in creationist's viewpoint, confusions about religion and the formal structure, methods, and canons of science. Reviews theological testimony in McLean v. Arkansas 590 (balanced treatment of creationism/evolution), indicating that the logic of plaintiff's case was directed at such confusions in and "scientific"…
Descriptors: Controversial Issues (Course Content), Court Litigation, Creationism, Elementary School Science

Thomas, William A., Ed. – Science, Technology, & Human Values, 1982
Presents edited versions of plaintiff and defendant outlines of legal issues and proof (views of cases set to limit issues argued during trials) and trial briefs (comprehensive presentations of legal precedents and arguments) in McLean v. Arkansas Board of Education case focusing on balanced treatment of creationism/evolution in public schools.…
Descriptors: Controversial Issues (Course Content), Court Litigation, Creationism, Elementary School Science