NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Žižic, Anisija; Granic, Andrina; Lukie, Michael Paul – International Journal for Talent Development and Creativity, 2017
Not all educational institutions encourage creativity and it is therefore vital that more attention be placed on the importance of understanding specific strategies that foster creativity at all levels in the classroom. Creativity conferences and workshops have become internationally common and have resulted in positive change-based initiatives in…
Descriptors: Creativity, Computer Science Education, Creative Development, 21st Century Skills
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Israel-Fishelson, Rotem; Hershkovitz, Arnon; Eguíluz, Andoni; Garaizar, Pablo; Guenaga, Mariluz – Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2021
Creativity and Computational Thinking (CT) have been both extensively researched in recent years. However, the associations between them are still not fully understood despite their recognition as essential competencies for the digital age. This study looks to bridge this gap by examining the association between CT and two types of creativity,…
Descriptors: Learning Analytics, Correlation, Creativity, Creative Thinking
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Fiebrink, Rebecca – ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 2019
This article aims to lay a foundation for the research and practice of machine learning education for creative practitioners. It begins by arguing that it is important to teach machine learning to creative practitioners and to conduct research about this teaching, drawing on related work in creative machine learning, creative computing education,…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Man Machine Systems, Population Groups, Creativity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Clements, Douglas H. – American Educational Research Journal, 1991
The effects of the LOGO computer programing environment on creativity were studied for 73 8-year-old third graders (33 males and 40 females) who were tested before and after LOGO instruction. Overall, the LOGO group significantly outperformed a comparison group receiving non-LOGO creativity training and a nontreatment control group. (SLD)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Instruction, Computer Science Education, Creative Development