Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 2 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 4 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 10 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 13 |
Descriptor
Credibility | 13 |
Evidence Based Practice | 9 |
Foreign Countries | 6 |
Policy Formation | 6 |
Expertise | 4 |
Decision Making | 3 |
Evidence | 3 |
Scientists | 3 |
Case Studies | 2 |
Cooperation | 2 |
Educational Policy | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Evidence & Policy: A Journal… | 13 |
Author
Anina Hanimann | 1 |
Argyrous, George | 1 |
Balian, Estelle V. | 1 |
Bauer, Anja | 1 |
Bruce, Ann | 1 |
Bédard, Pierre-Olivier | 1 |
Carter, Stacy | 1 |
Dagenais, Christian | 1 |
Downe, James | 1 |
Drius, Liza | 1 |
Eggermont, Hilde | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 13 |
Reports - Research | 10 |
Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Elizabeth Day; Karen Bogenschneider – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2024
Background: Understanding how policymakers define research and differentiate it from other sources of data is critical for scientists to improve how they conduct and communicate research to policy audiences. Yet, few studies have explicitly asked policymakers -- particularly state legislators in the USA -- how they define research evidence.…
Descriptors: Policy Formation, Legislators, State Legislation, Scientific Research
Sheldrick, R. Christopher; Hyde, Justeen; Leslie, Laurel K.; Mackie, Thomas – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2021
Many of the resources developed to promote the use of evidence in policy aspire to an ideal of rational decision making, yet their basis in the decision sciences is often unclear. Tracing the historical development of evidence-informed policy to its roots in "evidence-based medicine" (EBM), we distinguish between two understandings of…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Evidence Based Practice, Medicine, Expertise
Anina Hanimann – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2024
Background: Political scientists have repeatedly argued that politicians' behaviour can be influenced by their beliefs about their constituents' ability to hold them accountable. Yet, how such accountability beliefs affect politicians' information processing or behaviour remains understudied. Aims and objectives: I investigate how accountability…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Political Candidates, Accountability, Expertise
Williams, Jane; Rychetnik, Lucie; Carter, Stacy – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2020
Background: Organised cervical screening programmes are a combination of arrangements designed to maximise benefit and minimise harm associated with cervical cancer at the population level. Many organised programmes are described as 'evidence-based', reflecting an expectation that healthcare should be based on the tenets of Evidence-Based Medicine…
Descriptors: Cancer, Medical Evaluation, Evidence Based Practice, Health Programs
MacKillop, Eleanor; Downe, James – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2023
Background: Government-funded knowledge brokering organisations (KBOs) are an increasingly prevalent yet under-researched area. Working in the space between knowledge and policy, yet framing themselves as different from think tanks and academic research centres, these organisations broker evidence into policy. Aims and objectives: This article…
Descriptors: Knowledge Management, Research Projects, Evidence, Policy Formation
Gagnon, Stephanie; Mailhot, Chantale; Ziam, Saliha – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2019
Despite enthusiasm for the use of intermediation as a knowledge transfer strategy, there is little research documenting the conditions for its success. This article addresses the role of the intermediary in a collaborative research project. The focus is on how the intermediary facilitates the implementation of an interactive knowledge transfer…
Descriptors: Role, Cooperation, Transfer of Training, Case Studies
Rose, David Christian; Kenny, Caroline; Hobbs, Abbi; Tyler, Chris – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2020
Despite claims that we now live in a post-truth society, it remains commonplace for policy makers to consult research evidence to increase the robustness of decision making. Few scholars of evidence-policy interfaces, however, have used legislatures as sites of study, despite the fact that they play a critical role in modern democracies. There is…
Descriptors: Evidence Based Practice, Federal Legislation, Foreign Countries, Policy Formation
Bauer, Anja; Pregernig, Michael; Reinecke, Sabine – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2016
This article asks how scientific advisory institutions (SAIs) in climate policy strive towards effectiveness. Our analysis is grounded on the assumption that effectiveness is not passively experienced but is deliberately enacted by SAIs. We draw on a widely used set of criteria, namely saliency, credibility and legitimacy (SCL). Based on an…
Descriptors: Climate, Public Policy, Advisory Committees, Scientists
Balian, Estelle V.; Drius, Liza; Eggermont, Hilde; Livoreil, Barbara; Vandewalle, Marie; Vandewoestjine, Sofie; Wittmer, Heidi; Young, Juliette – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2016
Knowledge brokerage on biodiversity and ecosystem services can apply communication tools such as policy briefs to facilitate the dialogue between scientists and policymakers. There is currently considerable debate on how to go beyond the linear communication model, outdated in theoretical debate but still often implicitly leading interaction with…
Descriptors: Evidence Based Practice, Biodiversity, Ecology, Policy
Argyrous, George – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2015
This paper illustrates the use of a quality assessment tool for regression analysis. It is designed for non-specialist "consumers" of evidence, such as policy makers. The tool provides a series of questions such consumers of evidence can ask to interrogate regression analysis, and is illustrated with reference to a recent study published…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Regression (Statistics), Evidence, Critical Thinking
Bruce, Ann; O'Callaghan, Kenneth – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2016
The evidence-policy interface is important for delivery of sustainable development policy. We examine one specific form of knowledge brokering, the temporary placement of academic research scientists in UK policy arenas. We argue that successful knowledge brokerage depends on establishing social processes critical to effective knowledge exchange.…
Descriptors: Knowledge Management, Evidence Based Practice, Policy Formation, Sustainable Development
Ouimet, Mathieu; Bédard, Pierre-Olivier; Léon, Grégory; Dagenais, Christian – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2014
This study provides an empirical test of the assumption that the credibility of the messenger is one of the factors that influence knowledge mobilisation among policy makers. This general hypothesis was tested using a database of 321 social scientists from the province of Quebec that combines survey and bibliometric data. A regression model was…
Descriptors: Evidence, Faculty, Regression (Statistics), Knowledge Level
Souto-Otero, Manuel – Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2013
This article explores the initial results produced by the European Commission's "better regulation agenda", which aims to stimulate productivity and employment, on the use of evidence and its potential to enhance democratic governance. The article finds that implausible rational models of policy making dictate the ways in which the…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Public Policy, Educational Policy, Federal Regulation