NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 77 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Raoul Bell; Lena Nadarevic; Laura Mieth; Axel Buchner – Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2025
In present-day digital environments, people frequently encounter content from sources of questionable trustworthiness. Advertising is an untrustworthy source because its purpose is to persuade consumers rather than to provide impartial information. One factor known to enhance the perceived truth of advertising claims is repetition: Repeated…
Descriptors: Information Sources, Information Literacy, Critical Literacy, Credibility
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Colin Lescarret; Julien Magnier; Valérie Le Floch; Jean-Christophe Sakdavong; Jean-Michel Boucheix; Franck Amadieu – Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2024
In this study, we investigated the impact of prompting on young students' source consideration when watching videos with conflicting information. 262 French 7th graders were shown a series of videos in which two speakers (varying in credibility) took opposite stances on the topic of organic farming. The students were either given no prompts…
Descriptors: Trust (Psychology), Credibility, Middle School Students, Grade 7
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sylvia M. Savvidou; Irene-Anna Diakidoy; Lucia Mason – Reading Research Quarterly, 2025
The present study examined how argument type (science based vs. personal case based), belief consistency (belief consistent vs. inconsistent) and reading goals (read to evaluate vs. read to learn) influence comprehension and trustworthiness evaluations for claim-conflicting multiple texts. Undergraduates read four conflicting texts about the…
Descriptors: Reading Comprehension, Reading Processes, Persuasive Discourse, Beliefs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Daniel R. Pimentel – Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2025
Students frequently turn to the internet for information about a range of scientific issues. However, they can find it challenging to evaluate the credibility of the information they find, which may increase their susceptibility to mis- and disinformation. This exploratory study reports findings from an instructional intervention designed to teach…
Descriptors: Information Sources, Evaluative Thinking, Internet, Science Process Skills
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Blomberg, Matthew L. – Journal of Media Literacy Education, 2022
While people's proclivity toward congenial partisan media has been well documented, methods of resistance are less researched. This study explores the congenial media effect, the phenomenon of our gravitation to and acceptance of like-minded media, and whether a media literacy intervention can mitigate people's acceptance of ideologically…
Descriptors: Media Literacy, Mass Media Effects, Political Attitudes, Ideology
Susan Poland – ProQuest LLC, 2024
The field of science education has long advocated for students to leave K-12 education with an appreciation for the diversity of research methods scientists employ in order to effectively engage with research generated across many scientific fields of study. Yet, research has indicated that students typically believe research proceeds according to…
Descriptors: Student Attitudes, Scientific Attitudes, Scientific Research, Research Methodology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bogaard, Glynis; Meijer, Ewout H.; Van der Plas, Irina – Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2020
The present experiment investigated to what extent providing participants with a model statement influences the ability of the verifiability approach to detect deception. Participants gave a true and false statement about a negative autobiographical event, with half of the participants receiving a detailed model statement just before giving their…
Descriptors: Deception, Identification, Cues, Accuracy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kiili, Carita; Räikkönen, Eija; Bråten, Ivar; Strømsø, Helge I.; Hagerman, Michelle Schira – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2023
Background: Previous research indicates that students lack sufficient online credibility evaluation skills. However, the results are fragmented and difficult to compare as they are based on different types of measures and indicators. Consequently, there is no clear understanding of the structure of credibility evaluation. Objectives: The present…
Descriptors: Grade 6, Credibility, Information Literacy, Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Weber, Keith; Mejía-Ramos, Juan Pablo; Volpe, Tyler – Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 2022
Many mathematics educators believe a goal of instruction is for students to obtain conviction and certainty in mathematical statements using the same types of evidence that mathematicians do. However, few empirical studies have examined how mathematicians use proofs to obtain conviction and certainty. We report on a study in which 16 advanced…
Descriptors: Mathematical Logic, Evidence, Credibility, Doctoral Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ilic, Sandra; Damnjanovic, Kaja – Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2021
Pseudo-profound bullshit pertains to grammatically and syntactically correct but meaningless sentences, that, due to syntactical correctness appear as made to communicate something and research shows that people deem them profound. However, the effect of differing source credibility on bullshit profoundness evaluations has, to our knowledge, not…
Descriptors: Information Sources, Credibility, Syntax, Proverbs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Martire, Kristy A.; Growns, Bethany; Bali, Agnes S.; Montgomery-Farrer, Bronte; Summersby, Stephanie; Younan, Mariam – Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2020
Past research suggests that an uncritical or 'lazy' style of evaluating evidence may play a role in the development and maintenance of implausible beliefs. We examine this possibility by using a quasi-experimental design to compare how low- and high-quality evidence is evaluated by those who do and do not endorse implausible claims. Seven studies…
Descriptors: Evaluative Thinking, Beliefs, Misconceptions, Evidence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Vamanu, Iulian; Zak, Elizabeth – Information and Learning Sciences, 2022
Purpose: Learning how to identify and avoid inaccurate information, especially disinformation, is essential for any informational consumer. Many information literacy tools specify criteria that can help users evaluate information more efficiently and effectively. However, the authors of these tools do not always agree on which criteria should be…
Descriptors: Information Sources, Information Literacy, Evaluative Thinking, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Akram, Muhammad; Nasar, Asim; Arshad-Ayaz, Adeela – Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 2023
The manipulated or manufactured truth on social media platforms spreads false information to influence netizens' cognition, often resulting in fabricated social and political narratives. This study systematically reviews the literature on truth manipulation and its impact on the cognition of social media users. The primary focus is on…
Descriptors: Social Media, Deception, Misinformation, Propaganda
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pehlivanoglu, Didem; Lin, Tian; Deceus, Farha; Heemskerk, Amber; Ebner, Natalie C.; Cahill, Brian S. – Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2021
Aim: Previous research has focused on accuracy associated with real and fake news presented in the form of news headlines only, which does not capture the rich context news is frequently encountered in real life. Additionally, while previous studies on evaluation of real and fake news have mostly focused on characteristics of the evaluator (i.e.,…
Descriptors: Thinking Skills, Critical Reading, Evaluative Thinking, Credibility
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Roberts, Kim P.; Wood, Katherine R.; Wylie, Breanne E. – Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2021
One of the many sources of information easily available to children is the internet and the millions of websites providing accurate, and sometimes inaccurate, information. In the current investigation, we examined children's ability to use credibility information about websites when learning about environmental sustainability. In two studies,…
Descriptors: Young Children, Memory, Metacognition, Critical Reading
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6