NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kim, Sooyeon; Livingston, Samuel A. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2010
Score equating based on small samples of examinees is often inaccurate for the examinee populations. We conducted a series of resampling studies to investigate the accuracy of five methods of equating in a common-item design. The methods were chained equipercentile equating of smoothed distributions, chained linear equating, chained mean equating,…
Descriptors: Equated Scores, Test Items, Item Sampling, Item Response Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gross, Alan L.; Shulman, Vivian – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1980
The suitability of the beta binomial test model for criterion referenced testing was investigated, first by considering whether underlying assumptions are realistic, and second, by examining the robustness of the model. Results suggest that the model may have practical value. (Author/RD)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Goodness of Fit, Higher Education, Item Sampling
van den Brink, Wulfert – Evaluation in Education: International Progress, 1982
Binomial models for domain-referenced testing are compared, emphasizing the assumptions underlying the beta-binomial model. Advantages and disadvantages are discussed. A proposed item sampling model is presented which takes the effect of guessing into account. (Author/CM)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Criterion Referenced Tests, Item Sampling, Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Haladyna, Tom – Educational Leadership, 1982
Describes two types of criterion-referenced testing that districts can use to measure achievement outcomes of their instructional programs: a random sampling assessment plan and an item-response theory assessment plan. (Author/JM)
Descriptors: Behavioral Objectives, Criterion Referenced Tests, Elementary Secondary Education, Item Sampling
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stith, James H.; Costantine, Alfred G. – Physics Teacher, 1988
Outlines a method to write multiple (four) versions of each examination. Reviews some advantages and disadvantages of multiple-choice and open-ended problems. Considers the writing and grading techniques used. Reports that the examination met the consistency requirement and received a good evaluation from students. (YP)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, College Science, Criterion Referenced Tests, Essay Tests