Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Criterion Referenced Tests | 2 |
| Interrater Reliability | 2 |
| Test Interpretation | 2 |
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Anatomy | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Concept Mapping | 1 |
| Construct Validity | 1 |
| Educational Testing | 1 |
| Graduate Students | 1 |
| High Stakes Tests | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkClariana, Roy B.; Koul, Ravinder; Salehi, Roya – International Journal of Instructional Media, 2006
This investigation seeks to confirm a computer-based approach that can be used to score concept maps (Poindexter & Clariana, 2004) and then describes the concurrent criterion-related validity of these scores. Participants enrolled in two graduate courses (n=24) were asked to read about and research online the structure and function of the heart…
Descriptors: Semantics, Human Body, Test Validity, Anatomy
Curren, Randall R. – Theory and Research in Education, 2004
This article addresses the capacity of high stakes tests to measure the most significant kinds of learning. It begins by examining a set of philosophical arguments pertaining to construct validity and alleged conceptual obstacles to attributing specific knowledge and skills to learners. The arguments invoke philosophical doctrines of holism and…
Descriptors: Test Items, Educational Testing, Construct Validity, High Stakes Tests
