Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Animals | 2 |
| Cues | 2 |
| Interference (Learning) | 2 |
| African Languages | 1 |
| Associative Learning | 1 |
| Attention | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Context Effect | 1 |
| English | 1 |
| Experimental Psychology | 1 |
| Hypothesis Testing | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Luque, David | 1 |
| Nelson, James Byron | 1 |
| Orgaz, Cristina | 1 |
| Popp, Earl Y. | 1 |
| Serra, Michael J. | 1 |
| Vadillo, Miguel A. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Texas | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkVadillo, Miguel A.; Orgaz, Cristina; Luque, David; Nelson, James Byron – Learning & Memory, 2016
It has been suggested that people and nonhuman animals protect their knowledge from interference by shifting attention toward the context when presented with information that contradicts their previous beliefs. Despite that suggestion, no studies have directly measured changes in attention while participants are exposed to an interference…
Descriptors: Animals, Interference (Learning), Attention, Context Effect
Popp, Earl Y.; Serra, Michael J. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2016
Recent research suggests that human memory systems evolved to remember animate things better than inanimate things. In the present experiments, we examined whether these effects occur for both free recall and cued recall. In Experiment 1, we directly compared the effect of animacy on free recall and cued recall. Participants studied lists of…
Descriptors: Experimental Psychology, Memory, Recall (Psychology), Cues
