Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Associative Learning | 2 |
| Cues | 2 |
| Familiarity | 2 |
| Recall (Psychology) | 2 |
| Recognition (Psychology) | 2 |
| Tests | 2 |
| Alphabets | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Error Patterns | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Spain (Valencia) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkNicholas P. Maxwell; Mark J. Huff – Metacognition and Learning, 2024
Judgments of learning (JOLs) are often reactive on memory for cue-target pairs. This pattern, however, is moderated by relatedness, as related but not unrelated pairs often show a memorial benefit compared to a no-JOL control group. Based on Soderstrom et al.'s, "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition" 41,…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Recall (Psychology), Cues, Cognitive Processes
Download full textAlgarabel, S.; Pitarque, A.; Combita, L. M.; Rodriguez, L. A. – Psicologica: International Journal of Methodology and Experimental Psychology, 2013
We study the contribution of implicit relatedness to associative recognition in two experiments. In the first experiment, we showed an implicit improvement in recognition when the stimulus elements of each word pair shared common letters and they were unpaired at test. Moreover, when asked to study the stimuli under divided attention, recollection…
Descriptors: Recognition (Psychology), Recall (Psychology), Tests, Associative Learning
