NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Brainerd, C. J.; Reyna, V. F.; Ceci, S. J.; Holliday, R. E. – Psychological Bulletin, 2008
S. Ghetti (2008) and M. L. Howe (2008) presented probative ideas for future research that will deepen scientific understanding of developmental reversals on false memory and establish boundary conditions for these counterintuitive patterns. Ghetti extended the purview of current theoretical principles by formulating hypotheses about how…
Descriptors: Recognition (Psychology), Prediction, Learning Theories, Memory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
McDaniel, Mark A.; Guynn, Melissa J.; Einstein, Gilles O.; Breneiser, Jennifer – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2004
Several theories of event-based prospective memory were evaluated in 3 experiments. The results depended on the association between the target event and the intended action. For associated target-action pairs (a) preexposure of nontargets did not reduce prospective memory, (b) divided attention did not reduce prospective memory, (c) prospective…
Descriptors: Memory, Cues, Associative Learning, Cognitive Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
van Osselaer, Stijn M. J.; Janiszewski, Chris; Cunha Jr., Marcus – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2004
Recent studies involving nonlinear discrimination problems suggest that stimuli in human associative learning are represented configurally with narrow generalization, such that presentation of stimuli that are even slightly dissimilar to stored configurations weakly activate these configurations. The authors note that another well-known set of…
Descriptors: Stimuli, Learning Processes, Interaction, Stimulus Generalization
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Diana, Rachel A.; Reder, Lynne M. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2006
Low-frequency words produce more hits and fewer false alarms than high-frequency words in a recognition task. The low-frequency hit rate advantage has sometimes been attributed to processes that operate during the recognition test (e.g., L. M. Reder et al., 2000). When tasks other than recognition, such as recall, cued recall, or associative…
Descriptors: Word Frequency, Word Recognition, Cognitive Tests, Recall (Psychology)