NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1 to 15 of 35 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Martin, Floyd W. – Design for Arts in Education, 1991
Argues that art history should have a more prominent place in primary and secondary education. Suggests promoting art history by (1) ensuring that teachers are knowledgeable in the discipline; (2) studying art history through other disciplines; and (3) exposing students to real artworks, local architecture, and the significance of popular culture.…
Descriptors: Aesthetic Values, Architecture, Art Appreciation, Art Criticism
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hausman, Jerome J. – Design for Arts in Education, 1990
Discusses the future of art education in relation to changing demographics, technologies, values, and art forms. Reiterates two basic theories of art education: a separate subject with a defined place in the curriculum or a decentralized approach in which teacher involvement in the planning process has priority. (GG)
Descriptors: Art Education, Art History, Art Teachers, Curriculum Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Baker, David W. – Design for Arts in Education, 1990
States that the critical work for art educators will continue to be curriculum development and implementation. Claims that an emergent issue for art education is a community-relevant, developmentally appropriate curriculum. Discusses issues facing curriculum developers and outlines criteria for the art education curriculum. (GG)
Descriptors: Art, Art Education, Art Teachers, Curriculum Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Duke, Leilani Lattin – Design for Arts in Education, 1990
Examines the dichotomy between the affective and cognitive domains and the lack of support for art education in the school curriculum. Argues that, until school administrators view art as a mind building subject, it will retain marginal importance in the curriculum. Concludes that discipline-based art education will best meet the challenge. (GG)
Descriptors: Affective Objectives, Art, Art Education, Art Teachers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hatfield, Thomas R. – Design for Arts in Education, 1986
Advocates that art should be taught by the certified art educator. Suggests art programs should be based on a substantive content foundation, sequence, and integrated with four components: art production, aesthetics, art criticism, and art history. Questions the worth of enrichment, exposure, or entertainment without substantive content…
Descriptors: Art Education, Art Teachers, Curriculum Development, Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Zerull, David S. – Design for Arts in Education, 1990
Examines the style and content of evaluating student achievement in arts education. Considers student and teacher roles. Advocates formative rather than summative evaluation. Outlines Bennett Reimer's seven modes of interaction with the arts, seeking a vocabulary of arts assessment. Cautions against standardized testing in the arts. (KM)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Aesthetic Education, Art Education, Art Teachers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Oaks, Harold R. – Design for Arts in Education, 1988
Discussing the inadequate support that theater receives in elementary and secondary schools, the author explores the value of theatrical processes in teaching across the curriculum. Describes three levels of experience that are vital for learning, stating that teachers must do a better job of using theater as an educational tool. (GEA)
Descriptors: Art Education, Curriculum Development, Elementary Secondary Education, Instructional Improvement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Garoian, Charles R. – Design for Arts in Education, 1988
Explains how the study of art history encourages the development of critical thinking in adolescents by comparing Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives with Feldman's stages of art criticism. Offers curriculum-based recommendations for using art history and criticism to encourage critical thinking. (LS)
Descriptors: Art Appreciation, Art Education, Art History, Creative Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wagner, Ann – Design for Arts in Education, 1988
Presents a brief historical overview of the basic premises for fine arts education. Emphasizes that the fine arts should be taught as an end in themselves, with no utilitarian function attached to them. States that such aesthetic education is a necessity in the development of human beings. (GEA)
Descriptors: Aesthetic Education, Art Education, Curriculum Development, Elementary School Curriculum
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hope, Samuel – Design for Arts in Education, 1988
Examines the search for a common ground between arts advocates and art educators who are trying to establish an effective arts education program. Discusses sequential curriculum, the Getty Trust, and the integration approach, advocating a constant application of substance as the solution. (GEA)
Descriptors: Art, Art Education, Curriculum Development, Educational Planning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kay, Sandra – Design for Arts in Education, 1990
Argues that arts education should be a basic subject in the school curriculum because perception which is a key characteristic of art education is basic to intelligence. Outlines three phases of research concerning spatial ability and theories of perception. Highlights higher education's role in the relationship between arts education and general…
Descriptors: Art Education, Cognitive Development, Curriculum Development, Educational Philosophy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fichter, Nancy Smith – Design for Arts in Education, 1989
Discusses the potential impact of the recent call for cultural literacy on arts education. Describes current design approaches in the arts education curriculum. Suggests a number of ideas that are deemed important for curriculum reform. Cautions that curricular changes, although much needed, must be thoughtfully considered before implementation.…
Descriptors: Aesthetic Education, Art Education, Change Strategies, Curriculum Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Reimer, Bennett – Design for Arts in Education, 1989
Proposes a model for a comprehensive arts curriculum. Discusses the significant phases of the curriculum and relates them to each other. These phases include identification of values, conceptualization, systematizing, interpretation, operation, and experience. Lists five objectives that serve as criteria for judging the worth of curricula. (KO)
Descriptors: Aesthetic Education, Art Education, Curriculum Design, Curriculum Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Olson, Gerald B. – Design for Arts in Education, 1986
Proposes that the nature and need of the learner dictate decisions about who teaches arts and what an arts education should be. Maintains that teaching partnerships be established within the arts education community to revitalize the arts curriculum and outlines a model for a school arts program. (TRS)
Descriptors: Art Education, Community Involvement, Curriculum Design, Curriculum Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Shuler, Scott C. – Design for Arts in Education, 1988
Addresses the reasons arts education has not become a fully accepted part of the school curriculum. States that one cause is the failure to develop a sequential arts curricula. Discusses potential curriculum content, scheduling, assessment, and grading. (LS)
Descriptors: Advocacy, Art Education, Art Teachers, Course Content
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3