NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Back to results
ERIC Number: ED667972
Record Type: Non-Journal
Publication Date: 2021
Pages: 245
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: 979-8-5169-7707-7
ISSN: N/A
EISSN: N/A
Available Date: 0000-00-00
Georgia Secondary Education Science Curriculum: A Multi-Method Analysis of the Development and Redesign of the Standards
Lori Pierce Boyd
ProQuest LLC, Ed.D. Dissertation, Piedmont College
The history of education in the United States has been a contentious one. This holds true for science education in Georgia. Throughout history, there has been much debate on what should be taught and how it should be taught. There have been many influences on education including politics, economics, religion, and immigration. This multi-method qualitative study was conducted to answer four research questions related to the past and future of science standards adoption in Georgia. A historical analysis identified themes in science journals and science conferences that could have impacted science standards adoption in Georgia. A Delphi study analyzed what experts in the field thought should be considered when writing the science standards and what should be included in both the science graduation requirements and the science standards for required courses. Findings for the historical research indicated the themes prevalent in science journals were evidenced in the Georgia standards, including the Quality Core Curriculum, Georgia Performance Standards, and the Georgia Standards of Excellence. The Delphi answered three additional research questions. First, overwhelmingly, respondents believed transferability of skill to the workforce and everyday life was the most important factor to consider when writing science standards. Next, respondents believed biology, physical science, and environmental science were important courses for all of Georgia's students. Additionally, respondents believed an introductory science course should be required of students not planning on pursuing degrees in science fields. Finally, respondents believed standards related to anatomy and physiology should be included in a required course. Future implications for practice indicated there are several factors to consider when redesigning the science standards for Georgia. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]
ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml
Publication Type: Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations
Education Level: Secondary Education
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Identifiers - Location: Georgia
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A
Author Affiliations: N/A