NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1 to 15 of 21 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Littrell, J. Harvey; Bailey, Gerald Douglass – NASSP Bulletin, 1981
Offers suggestions for types and content of curriculum guides as well as for curriculum use and evaluation. (Author/WD)
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, Curriculum Evaluation, Curriculum Guides, Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hill, John – NASSP Bulletin, 1985
Offers practical suggestions for minimizing 14 problems that frequently occur when curriculum programs are evaluated. Timing evaluations, evaluating appropriate factors, making meaningful comparisons, meeting skepticism, selecting tests, selecting evaluators, assessing evaluation results, and maintaining credibility are among the concerns…
Descriptors: Curriculum Evaluation, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hunkins, Francis P. – NASSP Bulletin, 1985
Curriculum development should be a comprehensive process requiring a broad-based view of the educational system and its place within society, thus necessitating the use of a systematic curriculum development model. Such a model is provided here. Three references are provided. (DCS)
Descriptors: Curriculum Design, Curriculum Development, Curriculum Evaluation, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Callon, George F. – NASSP Bulletin, 1972
Presented in this article is the author's own experience in science curriculum change. (Editor)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Curriculum Development, Curriculum Evaluation, Science Curriculum
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hughes, Evelyn; Orr, William T., Jr. – NASSP Bulletin, 1989
To obtain information for planning school goals and activities, Armwood Senior High School (Seffner, Florida) decided to interview graduating seniors concerning the curricular program. This article reviews survey questions and significant responses. (MLH)
Descriptors: Curriculum Evaluation, High School Seniors, Planning, Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bailey, Gerald D. – NASSP Bulletin, 1986
Outlines how to develop and write an effective curriculum governance document to be used in creating and monitoring curriculum development. Includes specific steps to consider in developing the document. (MD)
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, Curriculum Evaluation, Educational Administration, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hickey, M. E. – NASSP Bulletin, 1973
Author gives thourough treatment to alternatives evaluation purposes and problems. (Editor)
Descriptors: Accountability, Curriculum Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Needs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Jasparro, Ralph J. – NASSP Bulletin, 1998
A systems approach to curriculum evaluation can produce better alignment among written, taught, and tested curriculum. Data and information gathered through comprehensive curriculum evaluation can also be used to improve other core areas of the system: organization, instruction, assessment, and professional development. A systems approach ensures…
Descriptors: Curriculum Evaluation, Educational Change, Educational Planning, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hill, John C. – NASSP Bulletin, 1988
To ensure that curriculum development staff are focusing on student needs, this article suggests a question matrix showing the holistic relationship in the planning, implementation, and outcomes processes and in five interrelated program components (curriculum design, instructional means, resources, staff development, and learning experience).…
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, Curriculum Evaluation, Elementary Secondary Education, Holistic Approach
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Talmage, Harriet – NASSP Bulletin, 1985
This article asks and answers the following three questions concerning curriculum evaluation: (1) why evaluate curricula; (2) if curriculum evaluation can be justified, then what are useful curriculum evaluation questions; and (3) given the constraints of time, money, and expertise, how can useful curriculum evaluation be conducted? (DCS)
Descriptors: Curriculum Evaluation, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Worner, Roger B. – NASSP Bulletin, 1972
Emphasis on the specific advantages of PPBS for principals, with special attention to evaluation as a component of PPBS and how it can improve principals' decision-making. (Editor)
Descriptors: Accountability, Cost Effectiveness, Curriculum Evaluation, Performance Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Masinton, Harry W.; And Others – NASSP Bulletin, 1981
Presents a model for needs assessment in school programs. The approach collects data from personal interviews with students, parents, community members, and professional staff; from an analysis of the existing curriculum; and from an in-depth student profile. (Author/WD)
Descriptors: Curriculum Evaluation, Data Analysis, Data Collection, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hammes, Richard R.; Lueptow, Lloyd – NASSP Bulletin, 1980
This survey of graduating high school seniors revealed an important discrepancy between what students perceive as the most important function of high school (developing emotionally stable persons) and the functions they perceived that the high school does best (teaching the basic skills and imparting information). (Author/IRT)
Descriptors: Curriculum Evaluation, Evaluation, High School Seniors, High Schools
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bailey, Gerald Douglass; Littrell, J. Harvey – NASSP Bulletin, 1981
School districts need a comprehensive, long-range blueprint for their total operation. The goal-competency-objective hierarchy allows them to become systematic in design and operation. (Author)
Descriptors: Competency Based Education, Curriculum Design, Curriculum Development, Curriculum Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Georgiades, William – NASSP Bulletin, 1980
A step-by-step process for changing curriculum, based on research by both the Ford and Danforth Foundations, stresses that administrators and teachers must work together to bring about meaningful change. (Author/MLF)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Change Strategies, Curriculum Development, Curriculum Evaluation
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2