NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Source
American Journal of Evaluation47
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 47 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stelmach, Rachel D.; Fitch, Elizabeth; Chen, Molly; Meekins, Meagan; Flueckiger, Rebecca M.; Colaço, Rajeev – American Journal of Evaluation, 2022
Monitoring, evaluation, and research activities generate important data, but they often fail to change policies or programs. In addition, local program staff and partners often feel disconnected from these activities, which undermines their ownership of data and results. To bridge the gaps between monitoring, evaluation, and research and to give…
Descriptors: Evidence Based Practice, Evaluation, Research, Global Approach
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Campbell, Rebecca; Goodman-Williams, Rachael; Feeney, Hannah; Fehler-Cabral, Giannina – American Journal of Evaluation, 2020
The purpose of this study was to develop triangulation coding methods for a large-scale action research and evaluation project and to examine how practitioners and policy makers interpreted both convergent and divergent data. We created a color-coded system that evaluated the extent of triangulation across methodologies (qualitative and…
Descriptors: Mixed Methods Research, Action Research, Data Interpretation, Coding
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pattyn, Valérie; Molenveld, Astrid; Befani, Barbara – American Journal of Evaluation, 2019
Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) is gaining ground in evaluation circles, but the number of applications is still limited. In this article, we consider the challenges that can emerge during a QCA evaluation by drawing on our experience of conducting one in the field of development cooperation. For each stage of the evaluation process, we…
Descriptors: Qualitative Research, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Finucane, Mariel McKenzie; Martinez, Ignacio; Cody, Scott – American Journal of Evaluation, 2018
In the coming years, public programs will capture even more and richer data than they do now, including data from web-based tools used by participants in employment services, from tablet-based educational curricula, and from electronic health records for Medicaid beneficiaries. Program evaluators seeking to take full advantage of these data…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Data Analysis, Program Evaluation, Randomized Controlled Trials
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
de Alteriis, Martin – American Journal of Evaluation, 2020
This article examines factors that could have influenced whether evaluations of U.S. government--funded foreign assistance programs completed in 2015 had considered unintended consequences. Logit regression models indicate that the odds of considering unintended consequences were increased when all or most of seven standard data collection methods…
Descriptors: Federal Programs, International Programs, Program Evaluation, Influences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hilton, Lara G.; Azzam, Tarek – American Journal of Evaluation, 2019
Evaluations that include stakeholders aim to understand their perspectives and to ensure that their views are represented. This article offers a new approach to gaining stakeholder perspectives through crowdsourcing. We recruited a sample of individuals with chronic low back pain through a crowdsourcing site. This sample coded textual data…
Descriptors: Qualitative Research, Stakeholders, Data Collection, Chronic Illness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Maxwell, Nan L.; Rotz, Dana; Garcia, Christina – American Journal of Evaluation, 2016
This study examines the perceptions of data-driven decision making (DDDM) activities and culture in organizations driven by a social mission. Analysis of survey information from multiple stakeholders in each of eight social enterprises highlights the wide divergence in views of DDDM. Within an organization, managerial and nonmanagerial staff…
Descriptors: Data, Decision Making, Organizational Climate, Organizational Culture
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Morell, Jonathan A. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2019
Project schedules are logic models that focus on the timing of program activities. Value derives from the fact that schedule changes are not random. Why they occur, and how long they last, can reveal information that would not be easily revealed with other approaches to evaluation. Also, using project schedules as logic models forges a strong link…
Descriptors: Scheduling, Program Administration, Models, Logical Thinking
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gee, Kevin A. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2014
The growth in the availability of longitudinal data--data collected over time on the same individuals--as part of program evaluations has opened up exciting possibilities for evaluators to ask more nuanced questions about how individuals' outcomes change over time. However, in order to leverage longitudinal data to glean these important insights,…
Descriptors: Longitudinal Studies, Data Analysis, Statistical Studies, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cueva, Katie; Fenaughty, Andrea; Liendo, Jessica Aulasa; Hyde-Rolland, Samantha – American Journal of Evaluation, 2020
Chronic diseases with behavioral risk factors are now the leading causes of death in the United States. A national Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) monitors those risk factors; however, there is a need for national and state evaluations of chronic disease surveillance systems. The Department of Health and Human Services/Centers…
Descriptors: Chronic Illness, At Risk Persons, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jacobson, Miriam R.; Whyte, Cristina E.; Azzam, Tarek – American Journal of Evaluation, 2018
Evaluators can work with brief units of text-based data, such as open-ended survey responses, text messages, and social media postings. Online crowdsourcing is a promising method for quantifying large amounts of text-based data by engaging hundreds of people to categorize the data. To further develop and test this method, individuals were…
Descriptors: Mixed Methods Research, Evaluation Methods, Comparative Analysis, Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Durand, Roger; Decker, Phillip J.; Kirkman, Dorothy M. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2014
Despite our best efforts as evaluators, program implementation failures abound. A wide variety of valuable methodologies have been adopted to explain and evaluate the "why" of these failures. Yet, typically these methodologies have been employed concurrently (e.g., project monitoring) or to the post-hoc assessment of program activities.…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Program Implementation, Failure, Program Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Koleros, Andrew; Jupp, Dee; Kirwan, Sean; Pradhan, Meeta S.; Pradhan, Pushkar K.; Seddon, David; Tumbahangfe, Ansu – American Journal of Evaluation, 2016
This article presents discussion and recommendations on approaches to retrospectively evaluating development interventions in the long term through a systems lens. It is based on experiences from the implementation of an 18-month study to investigate the impact of development interventions on economic and social change over a 40-year period in the…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Case Studies, Systems Development, International Programs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Groth Andersson, Signe; Denvall, Verner – American Journal of Evaluation, 2017
In recent years, performance management (PM) has become a buzzword in public sector organizations. Well-functioning PM systems rely on valid performance data, but critics point out that conflicting rationale or logic among professional staff in recording information can undermine the quality of the data. Based on a case study of social service…
Descriptors: Performance, Social Services, Case Studies, Data Collection
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Brandon, Paul R.; Fukunaga, Landry L. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2014
Evaluators widely agree that stakeholder involvement is a central aspect of effective program evaluation. With the exception of articles on collaborative evaluation approaches, however, a systematic review of the breadth and depth of the literature on stakeholder involvement has not been published. In this study, we examine peer-reviewed empirical…
Descriptors: Stakeholders, Research, Data Collection, Observation
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4