Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Data Collection | 3 |
Research Design | 3 |
Evaluation Methods | 2 |
Research Methodology | 2 |
Achievement Gains | 1 |
Achievement Gap | 1 |
Children | 1 |
Correlation | 1 |
Definitions | 1 |
Elementary School Teachers | 1 |
Evaluation Needs | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Educational Evaluation and… | 3 |
Author
Achilles, Charles M. | 1 |
Curran, F. Chris | 1 |
Lynch, Kathleen Bodisch | 1 |
Shen, Zuchao | 1 |
Splett, Joni Williams | 1 |
You, You | 1 |
Zhang, Huibin | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Opinion Papers | 2 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Early Childhood Education | 1 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Early Childhood Longitudinal… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Shen, Zuchao; Curran, F. Chris; You, You; Splett, Joni Williams; Zhang, Huibin – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2023
Programs that improve teaching effectiveness represent a core strategy to improve student educational outcomes and close student achievement gaps. This article compiles empirical values of intraclass correlations for designing effective and efficient experimental studies evaluating the effects of these programs. The Early Childhood Longitudinal…
Descriptors: Children, Longitudinal Studies, Surveys, Teacher Empowerment

Lynch, Kathleen Bodisch – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1983
The current literature is replete with instances of imprecise and conflicting usage of "qualitative" and "quantitative" evaluation. This paper presents a framework for making distinctions among several related concepts to eliminate this potential source of confusion. In the process, the terms "qualitative" and…
Descriptors: Data Collection, Definitions, Evaluation Methods, Models

Achilles, Charles M. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1982
Problems that face evaluators, including field based evaluations, are discussed. The author states that open communication, access to data, and an ability to be accepted are paramount; knowledge of randomness, robustness and homoscedasticity may be secondary. (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Data Collection, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Needs, Interpersonal Communication