Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 3 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 8 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 8 |
Descriptor
Source
IDEA Data Center | 8 |
Author
Bitterman, Amy | 2 |
Fiore, Tom | 2 |
Lammert, Jill | 2 |
Moore, Hadley | 2 |
Bernstein, Haidee | 1 |
Colgan, Siobhan | 1 |
Crain, Danielle | 1 |
Edwards, Jessica | 1 |
Finello, Karen | 1 |
Gooden, Caroline | 1 |
Hayes, Susan | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Guides - Non-Classroom | 3 |
Guides - General | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Policymakers | 1 |
Support Staff | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Individuals with Disabilities… | 5 |
Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Nagle, Kate; Hayes, Susan – IDEA Data Center, 2022
The purpose of this resource is to unpack Part B State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report (SPP/APR) Indicator 3D to better understand how to use it to improve outcomes for children with individualized education programs (IEPs). Indicator 3D is a new subcomponent of Indicator 3 in the Office of Special Education Programs' (OSEP) FFY…
Descriptors: Educational Legislation, Federal Legislation, Equal Education, Students with Disabilities
Bitterman, Amy; Lammert, Jill; Moore, Hadley; Schaaf, Jennifer – IDEA Data Center, 2021
This resource provides states with an overview on how to gather representative parent involvement data for State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report (SPP/APR) Indicator B8. The resource defines key concepts such as representativeness, sampling, nonresponse bias, response rates, and weighting. It also offers information on how to improve the…
Descriptors: Parent Participation, Data Collection, Annual Reports, Sampling
O'Hara, Nancy; Watson, Mary; Johnson, Nancy – IDEA Data Center, 2021
"Building Your SPP/APR Stakeholder Engagement Plan: 10 Essential Questions" can help states develop and report on authentic and broad stakeholder engagement as required in the FFY 2020-2025 SPP/APR. This interactive resource guides states through 10 key questions they should be asking themselves as they build their stakeholder engagement…
Descriptors: Stakeholders, Statewide Planning, Educational Legislation, Federal Legislation
Kimkoff, Tamara; Fiore, Tom; Edwards, Jessica – IDEA Data Center, 2020
This guide describes key steps for developing a well-thought-out plan for evaluating a State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP). The guide provides considerations for how to incorporate each step into an evaluation plan, as well as a series of worksheets that correspond to each step and can be used to facilitate the planning process. The guide,…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Educational Improvement, State Standards, Educational Legislation
Nimkoff, Tamara; Shaver, Debbie; Schroeder, Kim; Fiore, Tom – IDEA Data Center, 2017
During Phase III of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP), states will assess progress on implementing their SSIPs. This assessment entails evaluating and reporting on progress toward short-term and long-term outcomes as well as the SiMR. The purpose of this interactive self-assessment tool is to lead those within a state responsible for…
Descriptors: Self Evaluation (Individuals), Program Implementation, Stakeholders, Evaluation Methods
Crain, Danielle; Long, Terry; Munk, Tom; Nadkarni, Swati; Smith, Steve; Snyder, Laura; Thacker, Chris – IDEA Data Center, 2017
The Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) added four new data elements related to the local education agency (LEA) Maintenance of Effort (MOE) provisions of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) in the MOE Reduction and Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS) data collection. This resource, produced by The IDEA Data…
Descriptors: School Districts, Data Collection, Disclosure, Disabilities
Henson, Jim; Gooden, Caroline; Bernstein, Haidee; Romero, Luis; Colgan, Siobhan; Finello, Karen – IDEA Data Center, 2016
This white paper explores the variation among Part C exiting categories as reported by the 50 states and Washington, D.C., using 2012-13 exiting data. Examining factors that may contribute to variation can lead to improved Part C exiting data quality within and across states. Examination of the Part C exiting data shows that 8 of the 10 categories…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Equal Education, Federal Legislation, Educational Legislation
Lammert, Jill; Moore, Hadley; Bitterman, Amy – IDEA Data Center, 2018
This toolkit is designed to assist states as they plan for and carry out their efforts to collect, report, analyze, and use high-quality parent and family involvement data. It defines key concepts; offers guidance on ways to improve the quality of the collection, analysis, and use of parent and family involvement data; and provides resources and…
Descriptors: Parent Participation, Family Involvement, Data Collection, Data Analysis