Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Source
School Psychology Review | 3 |
Author
Van Norman, Ethan R. | 3 |
Ardoin, Scott P. | 1 |
Christ, Theodore J. | 1 |
Eckert, Tanya L. | 1 |
January, Stacy-Ann A. | 1 |
Nelson, Peter M. | 1 |
Parker, David C. | 1 |
White, Mary Jane | 1 |
Ysseldyke, James E. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 2 |
Early Childhood Education | 1 |
Grade 2 | 1 |
Grade 3 | 1 |
Grade 4 | 1 |
Grade 5 | 1 |
Intermediate Grades | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Primary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Van Norman, Ethan R.; Nelson, Peter M.; Parker, David C. – School Psychology Review, 2018
School psychologists regularly use decision rules to interpret student response to intervention in reading. Recent research suggests that the accuracy of those decision rules depends on the duration of progress monitoring, the number of observations available, and the amount of measurement error present. In this study, we extended existing…
Descriptors: Curriculum Based Assessment, School Psychologists, Decision Making, Accuracy
Van Norman, Ethan R.; Ysseldyke, James E. – School Psychology Review, 2020
Within multitiered systems of support, assessment practices that limit the amount of time students miss instruction should be prioritized. At the same time, decisions about student response to intervention need to be based upon technically adequate data. We evaluated the impact of data collection frequency and trend estimation method on the…
Descriptors: Data Collection, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Computation
January, Stacy-Ann A.; Van Norman, Ethan R.; Christ, Theodore J.; Ardoin, Scott P.; Eckert, Tanya L.; White, Mary Jane – School Psychology Review, 2018
The present study examined the utility of two progress monitoring assessment schedules (bimonthly and monthly) as alternatives to monitoring once weekly with curriculum-based measurement in reading (CBM-R). General education students (N = 93) in Grades 2-4 who were at risk for reading difficulties but not yet receiving special education services…
Descriptors: Progress Monitoring, Reading Improvement, Reading Tests, Student Evaluation