Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 6 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 9 |
Descriptor
Source
Regional Educational… | 2 |
Beyond Behavior | 1 |
Communication Disorders… | 1 |
National Center for Systemic… | 1 |
ProQuest LLC | 1 |
South Dakota Department of… | 1 |
Teacher Education and Special… | 1 |
Technical Assistance Center… | 1 |
Author
Lindsay, Jim | 2 |
Miskell, Ryan | 2 |
Bailey, Tessie | 1 |
Bruhn, Allison L. | 1 |
Conley, Kathleen M. | 1 |
Drury, Debra A. | 1 |
Estrapala, Sara | 1 |
Hall, Laura J. | 1 |
Horner, Robert H. | 1 |
Marvin, Christine A. | 1 |
McDaniel, Sara C. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Descriptive | 4 |
Reports - Research | 4 |
Journal Articles | 3 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 3 |
Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 4 |
Grade 1 | 2 |
Grade 2 | 2 |
Grade 3 | 2 |
Grade 4 | 2 |
Grade 5 | 2 |
Kindergarten | 2 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Administrators | 2 |
Practitioners | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Dynamic Indicators of Basic… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Conley, Kathleen M.; Horner, Robert H.; McIntosh, Kent – Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, 2019
A core feature of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) is the collection, summary, and use of data for iterative decision-making. The initial design of support and the adaptations that make behavior support match cultural, organizational, and personal needs require that a support team have functional information to guide…
Descriptors: Positive Behavior Supports, Elementary School Students, Decision Making, Progress Monitoring
Ruedel, Kristin; Nelson, Gena; Bailey, Tessie – National Center for Systemic Improvement at WestEd, 2018
To evaluate interim progress toward the State-identified Measurable Result (SIMR), states require access to high-quality data from local education agencies (LEAs) and early intervention service providers. In a review of 2017 Phase III State Systemic Improvement Plans (SSIP), 43 Part C states noted limitations or concerns related to data and…
Descriptors: Fidelity, Data Collection, State Standards, Barriers
Bruhn, Allison L.; McDaniel, Sara C.; Rila, Ashley; Estrapala, Sara – Beyond Behavior, 2018
Students who are at risk for or show low-intensity behavioral problems may need targeted, Tier 2 interventions. Often, Tier 2 problem-solving teams are charged with monitoring student responsiveness to intervention. This process may be difficult for those who are not trained in data collection and analysis procedures. To aid practitioners in these…
Descriptors: Progress Monitoring, Behavior Problems, Student Behavior, At Risk Students
Thomas, Anne E.; Marvin, Christine A. – Communication Disorders Quarterly, 2016
Program monitoring is an important and necessary assessment practice within the field of early childhood deaf education. Effective program monitoring requires a focus on both the consistent implementation of intervention strategies (fidelity) and the assessment of children's ongoing progress in response to interventions (progress monitoring).…
Descriptors: Partial Hearing, Deafness, Early Intervention, Progress Monitoring
Ruffini, Stephen J.; Miskell, Ryan; Lindsay, Jim; McInerney, Maurice; Waite, Winsome – Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest, 2016
Many schools identified by states as needing improvement through their Elementary and Secondary Education Act waivers have selected Response to Intervention (RTI), a three-tiered instruction program sometimes referred to as tiered levels of instruction, as one of their main strategies for improving school performance and closing achievement gaps.…
Descriptors: Program Implementation, Fidelity, Response to Intervention, Public Schools
Ruffini, Steffen J.; Lindsay, Jim; Miskell, Ryan; Proger, Amy – Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest, 2016
Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest assisted Milwaukee Public Schools in developing a fidelity monitoring system for measuring schools' progress in implementing Response to Intervention (RTI). The study examined the ratings produced by that system to determine the system's reliability, schools' progress in implementing RTI, and whether ratings…
Descriptors: Program Implementation, Fidelity, Response to Intervention, Public Schools
Hall, Laura J. – Teacher Education and Special Education, 2015
Supporting special educators' sustained use of evidence-based practices (EBPs) is a priority for the field. In this study, the authors used multiple measures to evaluate the first graduated cohort from a university program 6 years after graduation with a master's degree with a specialization in autism, and at least 8 years working as…
Descriptors: Evidence, Communities of Practice, Sustainability, Special Education Teachers
Drury, Debra A. – ProQuest LLC, 2014
The purpose of this problem-based study was to gather data which analyzed the degree of fidelity of implementation of Response to Intervention as reported by building principals in the State of Missouri. The project began when team members, providing professional development for the Response to Intervention process, came to the conclusion there…
Descriptors: Fidelity, Program Implementation, Response to Intervention, Public Schools
South Dakota Department of Education, 2012
The National Association of State Directors of Special Education (NASDSE, 2005) defines response to intervention (RTI) as the practice of providing high-quality instruction and intervention based on a student's needs, changing instruction and/or goals through frequent monitoring of progress, and applying the student response data to important…
Descriptors: Response to Intervention, Program Implementation, Models, At Risk Students