NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 22 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nicholas D. Myers; Ahnalee M. Brincks; Seungmin Lee – Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 2024
Physical activity promotion is a best buy for public health because it has the potential to help individuals feel better, sleep better, and perform daily tasks more easily, in addition to providing disease prevention benefits. There is strong evidence that individual-level theory-based behavioral interventions are effective for increasing physical…
Descriptors: Physical Activity Level, Health Behavior, Health Promotion, Public Health
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Jennifer Hill; George Perrett; Stacey A. Hancock; Le Win; Yoav Bergner – Statistics Education Research Journal, 2024
Most current statistics courses include some instruction relevant to causal inference. Whether this instruction is incorporated as material on randomized experiments or as an interpretation of associations measured by correlation or regression coefficients, the way in which this material is presented may have important implications for…
Descriptors: Statistics Education, Causal Models, Statistical Inference, College Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jaylin Lowe; Charlotte Z. Mann; Jiaying Wang; Adam Sales; Johann A. Gagnon-Bartsch – Grantee Submission, 2024
Recent methods have sought to improve precision in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) by utilizing data from large observational datasets for covariate adjustment. For example, consider an RCT aimed at evaluating a new algebra curriculum, in which a few dozen schools are randomly assigned to treatment (new curriculum) or control (standard…
Descriptors: Randomized Controlled Trials, Middle School Mathematics, Middle School Students, Middle Schools
Kraft, Matthew A. – Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University, 2019
Researchers commonly interpret effect sizes by applying benchmarks proposed by Cohen over a half century ago. However, effects that are small by Cohen's standards are large relative to the impacts of most field-based interventions. These benchmarks also fail to consider important differences in study features, program costs, and scalability. In…
Descriptors: Data Interpretation, Effect Size, Intervention, Benchmarking
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bentler, Peter M. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2016
The latent factor in a causal indicator model is no more than the latent factor of the factor part of the model. However, if the causal indicator variables are well-understood and help to improve the prediction of individuals' factor scores, they can help to interpret the meaning of the latent factor. Aguirre-Urreta, Rönkkö, and Marakas (2016)…
Descriptors: Causal Models, Factor Analysis, Prediction, Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wang, Jue; Engelhard, George, Jr. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2016
The authors of the focus article describe an important issue related to the use and interpretation of causal indicators within the context of structural equation modeling (SEM). In the focus article, the authors illustrate with simulated data the effects of omitting a causal indicator. Since SEMs are used extensively in the social and behavioral…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Measurement, Causal Models, Construct Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rhemtulla, Mijke; van Bork, Riet; Borsboom, Denny – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2015
In this commentary, Mijke Rhemtulla, Riet van Bork, and Denny Borsboom write that they were delighted to see Bainter and Bollen's paper as a focus article in "Measurement." In their view, psychological researchers who use SEM rely too reflexively on reflective measurement, without sufficiently considering whether their indicators are…
Descriptors: Causal Models, Measurement, Data Interpretation, Statistical Data
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bainter, Sierra A.; Bollen, Kenneth A. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2014
In measurement theory, causal indicators are controversial and little understood. Methodological disagreement concerning causal indicators has centered on the question of whether causal indicators are inherently sensitive to interpretational confounding, which occurs when the empirical meaning of a latent construct departs from the meaning…
Descriptors: Measurement, Statistical Analysis, Data Interpretation, Causal Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Guyon, Hervé; Tensaout, Mouloud – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2015
This article is a commentary on the Focus Article, "Interpretational Confounding or Confounded Interpretations of Causal Indicators?" and a commentary that was published in issue 12(4) 2014 of "Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspectives". The authors challenge two claims: (a) Bainter and Bollen argue that the…
Descriptors: Causal Models, Measurement, Data Interpretation, Structural Equation Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Howell, Roy D. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2014
Building on the work of Bollen (2007) and Bollen & Bauldry (2011), Bainter and Bollen (this issue) clarifies several points of confusion in the literature regarding causal indicator models. This author would certainly agree that the effect indicator (reflective) measurement model is inappropriate for some indicators (such as the social…
Descriptors: Statistical Analysis, Measurement, Causal Models, Data Interpretation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nicole Bohme Carnegie; Masataka Harada; Jennifer L. Hill – Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2016
A major obstacle to developing evidenced-based policy is the difficulty of implementing randomized experiments to answer all causal questions of interest. When using a nonexperimental study, it is critical to assess how much the results could be affected by unmeasured confounding. We present a set of graphical and numeric tools to explore the…
Descriptors: Randomized Controlled Trials, Simulation, Evidence Based Practice, Barriers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cope, Bill; Kalantzis, Mary – Open Review of Educational Research, 2015
In this article, we argue that big data can offer new opportunities and roles for educational researchers. In the traditional model of evidence-gathering and interpretation in education, researchers are independent observers, who pre-emptively create instruments of measurement, and insert these into the educational process in specialized times and…
Descriptors: Data Collection, Data Interpretation, Evidence, Educational Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Luhmann, Christian C.; Ahn, Woo-kyoung – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2011
In existing models of causal induction, 4 types of covariation information (i.e., presence/absence of an event followed by presence/absence of another event) always exert identical influences on causal strength judgments (e.g., joint presence of events always suggests a generative causal relationship). In contrast, we suggest that, due to…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Causal Models, Learning, Influences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Goedert, Kelly M.; Ellefson, Michelle R.; Rehder, Bob – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2014
Individuals have difficulty changing their causal beliefs in light of contradictory evidence. We hypothesized that this difficulty arises because people facing implausible causes give greater consideration to causal alternatives, which, because of their use of a positive test strategy, leads to differential weighting of contingency evidence.…
Descriptors: Causal Models, Inferences, Beliefs, Attitude Change
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Luhmann, Christian C.; Ahn, Woo-kyoung – Psychological Review, 2007
Dealing with alternative causes is necessary to avoid making inaccurate causal inferences from covariation data. However, information about alternative causes is frequently unavailable, rendering them unobserved. The current article reviews the way in which current learning models deal, or could deal, with unobserved causes. A new model of causal…
Descriptors: Inferences, Learning Processes, Probability, Models
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2