The principal findings were that deaf college students recalled more information from the first two quarters than from the second two; more information from a printed than from an interpreted presentation; and more information from a second interpreted presentation than from a previous interpreted one. (Author)

Questionnaires were administered to 121 hearing-impaired college students in 29 courses in which a real-time graphic display (RTGD) was used in addition to simultaneous interpreting and paid notetaking. Students rated the real-time print on a television screen more helpful than interpreting and hard-copy printout more helpful than notes of student…

Two experiments involving 36 deaf students investigated the effect of interpreted versus printed presentation on the recall of thematically relevant material. In Experiment 1, 20 deaf college students received an interpreted, videotaped presentation of one lecture and a printed presentation of a second lecture, with the two lecture topics…

Four experiments examined the utility of real-time text in supporting deaf students' learning from lectures in postsecondary (Experiments 1 and 2) and secondary classrooms (Experiments 3 and 4). Experiment 1 compared the effects on learning of sign language interpreting, real-time text (C-Print), and both. Real-time text alone led to significantly…