NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 10 results Save | Export
Benoit, William L. – 1999
Presidential debates come in all shapes and sizes. The presence and length of opening statements and closing remarks, the opportunity and length of rebuttal, the nature of the questioner, and other factors have created a bewildering variety of formats. However, most scholars agree that these confrontations are not "really" debates but merely…
Descriptors: Debate, Debate Format, Higher Education, Presidential Campaigns (United States)
Benoit, William L.; Follert, Vincent F. – 1979
Legislative intent as a debate tactic is drawn from the judicial system as a fundamental concept in the interpretation of statutes. Two paradigms for the application of legislative intent have emerged: (1) the courts will examine the affirmative proposal after enactment to bring it into line with the intent of the affirmative team, and (2) the…
Descriptors: Debate, Higher Education, Persuasive Discourse, Public Speaking
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Benoit, William L.; McKinney, Mitchell S.; Stephenson, Michael T. – Journal of Communication, 2002
Reports the results of two studies measuring the effects on undergraduate communication students of watching U.S. presidential primary debates. Concludes that primary debates are capable of influencing both policy and character impressions of the candidates, as well as changing voting intentions and increasing voter confidence. (SG)
Descriptors: Communication Research, Debate, Higher Education, Presidential Campaigns (United States)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Benoit, William L.; Hansen, Glenn J. – Human Communication Research, 2004
This study employs NES (National Election Survey) data from several presidential elections to investigate the effects of presidential debate watching on voters' issue knowledge, character evaluation, and vote choice. Debates can instill issue knowledge; however, voters are less likely to learn about incumbent presidents seeking re-election after a…
Descriptors: Elections, Political Campaigns, Knowledge Level, Surveys
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Benoit, William L.; And Others – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1986
Outlines the need to develop specific decision rules for the various judging paradigms in academic debate. Uses the policy-making metaphor as an example. (PD)
Descriptors: Debate, Decision Making, Evaluation Criteria, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Benoit, William L.; Currie, Heather – Argumentation and Advocacy, 2001
Compares data from a content analysis of the 1996 and 2000 presidential debates with news coverage of those debates. Concludes that the average newspaper story in 2000 only reported 7% of what the candidates said in a debate. Suggests that voters cannot expect to obtain an accurate or complete representation of presidential debates from media…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Debate, Higher Education, Mass Media Use
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Benoit, William L.; McKinney, Mitchell S.; Holbert, R. Lance – Communication Monographs, 2001
Uses a pretest/posttest design to assess more subtle effects of watching a 2000 presidential debate on attitudes and vote intention among undergraduate students. Notes that leadership and overall policy stance became more important factors in vote choice after watching the debate. Demonstrates a variety of potentially important effects of watching…
Descriptors: Communication Research, Debate, Higher Education, Leadership
Follert, Vincent F.; Benoit, William L. – 1981
The recent innovation of adapting the debate to the judge's preferred philosophy appears to have been supplanted by a converse trend: advocates now attempt to force the judge to adopt the paradigm dictated by the strategies of the debate round. The existence of such a widespread dispute over the appropriate decision making system in debate…
Descriptors: Debate, Decision Making, Evaluation Criteria, Guidelines
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Benoit, William L.; Brazeal, LeAnn M. – Argumentation and Advocacy, 2002
Applies the Functional Theory of Political Campaign Discourse to the 1988 presidential debates between George Bush and Michael Dukakis. Challenges the notion that this campaign was mostly negative. Concludes that despite the belief that modern campaigns are devoid of substance, these debates stressed policy about twice as much as character. (SG)
Descriptors: Communication Research, Debate, Discourse Analysis, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Benoit, William L.; Webber, David J.; Berman, Julie – Argumentation and Advocacy, 1998
Compares respondents who watched the first 1996 presidential debate with respondents who did not. Finds (1) those who watched the debate could more accurately recognize issue positions of Clinton and Dole than nonwatchers; (2) differences in the groups' assessment of character traits of the leading candidates; and (3) more respondents gave policy…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Debate, Decision Making, Persuasive Discourse