Descriptor
Debate | 6 |
Higher Education | 5 |
Debate Format | 3 |
Parliamentary Procedures | 3 |
Judges | 2 |
Persuasive Discourse | 2 |
Administrator Behavior | 1 |
Administrator Education | 1 |
Administrators | 1 |
Attitude Measures | 1 |
Community Attitudes | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Jensen, Scott | 6 |
Publication Type
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 6 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Guides - Classroom - Teacher | 1 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Jensen, Scott – 1998
If the forensics community has real choice between debate formats, there must be distinctions that justify the existence of each respective style or organization. While such differences can exist at any one of a number of levels, this paper examines differences in adjudicating in both parliamentary and team policy debate, generally known as CEDA…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Debate, Debate Format, Higher Education
Jensen, Scott – 1996
Parliamentary debate, while not a new format, has proliferated to all regions of the country. New and growing debate formats, while valuable for students and programs, must maintain sound pedagogical foundations if they are to be considered viable forensic alternatives. A reading of the National Parliamentary Debate Association (NPDA) rules as…
Descriptors: Debate, Debate Format, Instructional Improvement, Judges
Jensen, Scott – 1998
This paper argues that parliamentary debate provides a meaningful alternative for programs looking to offer debate components in their mission. The most important assumption in the paper is that comprehensive programs are valuable educational laboratories and require debate activities as part of their comprehensiveness; in fact, the comprehensive…
Descriptors: Debate, Debate Format, Higher Education, Parliamentary Procedures
Jensen, Scott – 1997
Today's collegiate forensic activities have changed in ways that pose profound challenges to directors of forensics. Six primary factors that contribute to the "at-riskness" of directors of forensics are: the changing face of today's forensic program forces difficult choices; the forensics community is seeing signs of a crisis in…
Descriptors: Administrator Behavior, Administrators, Debate, Higher Education
Unifying Research and Teaching: Pedagogy for the Transition from Forensics Competition to Education.
Jensen, Scott – 1996
At a minimum, tomorrow's forensic educators need formal training that orients the professional to the responsibilities central to forensic education. While a number of opportunities, as well as applications of those opportunities, are available to forensics students, the rooting of forensics in the speech communication discipline is paramount.…
Descriptors: Administrator Education, Course Descriptions, Debate, Higher Education
Jensen, Scott – 1995
A study assessed the Cross Examination Debate Association (CEDA) community's attitudes regarding the use of database services in general, and LEXIS/NEXIS in particular. The study followed a review of issues relating to database research in CEDA debate. Two surveys were conducted--a mail survey to CEDA programs and a tournament survey of CEDA…
Descriptors: Attitude Measures, Community Attitudes, Databases, Debate