NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chiu, Ming Ming; Jeong, Allan – Educational Technology Research and Development, 2020
We examined how social antecedents impact students' use of explanations versus evidence to justify arguments using "statistical discourse analysis" on 2028 postings from 87 graduate students in five courses, each participating in four online debates. The results show that students overall were much more likely to justify arguments with…
Descriptors: Evidence, Graduate Students, Research Universities, Persuasive Discourse
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jeong, Allan; Chiu, Ming Ming – Educational Technology Research and Development, 2020
Online group debates hosted in asynchronous threaded discussions can facilitate critical thinking between discussants (and increase deeper understanding of complex problems) by eliminating the need for turn-taking while formulating and presenting premises to support and challenge claims. Yet to be determined is to what extent does the current…
Descriptors: Brainstorming, Persuasive Discourse, Computer Mediated Communication, Teamwork
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jeong, Allan; Liu, Zhichun – TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 2017
Because prior beliefs can affect how people argue and respond to controversial claims, in this study we examined how patterns in students' responses posted in online debates were associated with students' initial positions on given claims prior to debate. Students that held initial opposing positions to the claim exhibited the tendency to respond…
Descriptors: Interaction, Computer Mediated Communication, Group Discussion, Critical Thinking
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jeong, Allan; Davidson-Shivers, Gayle V. – Educational Technology Research and Development, 2006
In this study we examined response patterns in exchanges between males and females and their effects on gender participation in five online debates. Students classified messages into arguments, evidence, critiques, and elaborations while posting messages to the debates to facilitate argumentation and the sequential analysis of message-response…
Descriptors: Persuasive Discourse, Females, Student Participation, Group Dynamics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jeong, Allan; Joung, Sunyoung – Computers and Education, 2007
This study examined the effects of message constraints and labels on collaborative argumentation in asynchronous online discussions. Thirty-eight undergraduate students in an introductory educational technology course were assigned to one of three groups. In one group, students posted specific types of messages using a prescribed set of message…
Descriptors: Scaffolding (Teaching Technique), Undergraduate Students, Educational Technology, Introductory Courses
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Brooks, C. Darren; Jeong, Allan – Distance Education, 2006
This study examined the effects of pre-structuring discussion threads on group performance in computer-supported collaborative argumentation where students labeled their messages as arguments, challenges, supporting evidence, and explanations on a threaded discussion board. In the pre-structured group students were required to post supporting and…
Descriptors: Persuasive Discourse, Group Dynamics, Control Groups, Cognitive Style
Jeong, Allan – Journal of Distance Education, 2004
This study examined the effects of response time and message content on the growth patterns of discussion threads in computer-supported collaborative argumentation. Event sequence analysis was used to measure response times between threaded messages and responses containing arguments, evidence, critiques, evaluations, and other comments from…
Descriptors: Reaction Time, Persuasive Discourse, Debate, Response Rates (Questionnaires)