NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Boileau, Don M.; And Others – 1979
In 1978-79 the Michigan Interscholastic Forensic Association adopted a three-part testing procedure to certify debate judges and make them eligible for officiating at district and state tournaments. The development and application of the procedure required a blending of debate principles and administration. Certification as a debate judge required…
Descriptors: Certification, Debate, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Boileau, Don M.; And Others – Communication Education, 1981
Describes a program to certify state and district judges of high school debate tournaments. Covers constructing the written test, evaluating the ballot test, implementing certification, and assessing the program. (PD)
Descriptors: Accountability, Certification, Debate, Evaluation Methods
Ulrich, Walter – 1982
There is a tendency for debaters and judges to view a single quote or opinion as conclusive evidence proving a point. But evidence can only point toward a conclusion; it cannot prove a conclusion conclusively. Experts may offer their opinions (sometimes as fact) but these opinions are only educated guesses. This is not to say that evidence from…
Descriptors: Competition, Credibility, Debate, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Decker, Warren D.; Morello, John T. – Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1984
Argues that the "Multiple Preference System" in assigning debate judges should be discontinued because it is unfair, discriminatory, and perpetuates ethnocentric responses. Recommends a nonevaluative system of judge assignment. (PD)
Descriptors: Debate, Educational Practices, Ethnocentrism, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hunt, Isaac Cosby, III – Social Education, 2006
In this article, the author relates how his school beats up the post-national examination blues by staging a "May Madness" competition. The competition is like a "tournament of historical figures" wherein students are asked to debate which historical figures were more significant until they have a "Final Four" and, eventually, a winner. The author…
Descriptors: Competition, Social Sciences, History Instruction, Debate