Descriptor
Source
| Speaker and Gavel | 17 |
Author
| Balthrop, Bill, Ed. | 2 |
| Towne, Ralph | 2 |
| Cox, J. Robert | 1 |
| Decker, Warren D. | 1 |
| Fisher, Randall | 1 |
| Flegle, Jim | 1 |
| Jones, Ben | 1 |
| Kay, Jack, Ed. | 1 |
| Kovalcheck, Kassian | 1 |
| Kruger, Arthur N. | 1 |
| Mincberg, Elliot | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Collected Works - Serials | 6 |
| Information Analyses | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
| Guides - Classroom - Teacher | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedFisher, Randall; Kovalcheck, Kassian – Speaker and Gavel, 1974
Descriptors: Debate, Higher Education, Humanization, Intercollegiate Cooperation
Recapturing the Rhetorical Dimension: Debating in Campus Forums--A Symposium on Humanizing Forensics
Peer reviewedRitter, Kurt W. – Speaker and Gavel, 1974
Advocates return of collegiate debating to public forum format. (CH)
Descriptors: Debate, Higher Education, Humanization, Intercollegiate Cooperation
Peer reviewedMontgomery, Charles L. – Speaker and Gavel, 1974
A critique of Super-Competitive, National Prestige Oriented intercollegiate tournament debate. (CH)
Descriptors: College Programs, Competitive Selection, Debate, Higher Education
Peer reviewedDecker, Warren D. – Speaker and Gavel, 1974
Discusses impact of the "information explosion" on college debaters. (CH)
Descriptors: Debate, Higher Education, Humanization, Information Dissemination
Peer reviewedTowne, Ralph – Speaker and Gavel, 1974
Discusses the influence of judges on tournament debaters. (CH)
Descriptors: Debate, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education
Peer reviewedPelham, Howard – Speaker and Gavel, 1974
First affirmative rebuttal strategies are analyzed. (CH)
Descriptors: Communication Skills, Debate, Evaluation, Intercollegiate Cooperation
Peer reviewedZarefsky, David; Mincberg, Elliot – Speaker and Gavel, 1974
Discusses implications of debate judges' bias in theoretical argumentation. (CH)
Descriptors: Debate, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education
Peer reviewedJones, Ben; Flegle, Jim – Speaker and Gavel, 1974
Practical example of need for more in-depth study of debate theory. (CH)
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Communication Skills, Debate, Evaluation
Download full textBalthrop, Bill, Ed. – Speaker and Gavel, 1979
The 16 articles in this journal issue identify and assess change and constants in intercollegiate forensics during the decade of the 1970s. The articles give varying perspectives on the significance of the decade and the topics range from concern for tenure for the debate coach to the formats of argumentation theory within the debates themselves.…
Descriptors: Debate, Educational Trends, Faculty Advisers, Higher Education
Balthrop, Bill, Ed. – Speaker and Gavel, 1980
The 14 articles in this journal issue focus on the role of forensics in the eighties. Among the topics discussed in the articles are the following: (1) the survival of forensics, (2) intercollegiate debate, (3) accountability, and (4) intercollegiate forensics. In addition, several articles provide predictions and projections for the future of…
Descriptors: Accountability, Debate, Educational Trends, Futures (of Society)
Peer reviewedSilver, Wayne – Speaker and Gavel, 1974
Discusses benefits of integration of college debate with broader communication studies. (CH)
Descriptors: Debate, Extracurricular Activities, Higher Education, Intercollegiate Cooperation
Peer reviewedTowne, Ralph; And Others – Speaker and Gavel, 1974
Descriptors: Bibliographies, Debate, Higher Education, Intercollegiate Cooperation
Peer reviewedKruger, Arthur N. – Speaker and Gavel, 1973
Current complaints about academic debate can be answered by more careful coaching and judging, not by the elimination of debate programs. (CH)
Descriptors: Communication (Thought Transfer), Debate, Extracurricular Activities, Intercollegiate Cooperation
Peer reviewedRitter, Kurt W., Ed. – Speaker and Gavel, 1981
Prepared by educators and researchers involved in argumentation and debate, the articles in this special journal issue are based upon the assumptions that presidential debates are important, are likely to continue, and are of unique interest to students, scholars, and practitioners of argument. The first two articles in the issue provide overviews…
Descriptors: Audiences, Communication Research, Content Analysis, Debate
Warnick, Barbara; Ruf, Henry L. – Speaker and Gavel, 1980
The two articles in this publication focus on ways of teaching argumentation and debate in the college setting. The first article examines the place of the argumentation and debate course in the speech communication curriculum and suggests cognitive and behavioral objectives and assignments for use in such a course. The second article discusses…
Descriptors: Assignments, Course Content, Course Descriptions, Course Objectives
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2
