Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Decision Making | 2 |
| Experiments | 2 |
| Information Processing | 2 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Cues | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Expectation | 1 |
| Measures (Individuals) | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| Prediction | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Cognition | 2 |
Author
| Jepma, Marieke | 1 |
| Mussweiler, Thomas | 1 |
| Nieuwenhuis, Sander | 1 |
| Posten, Ann-Christin | 1 |
| Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkJepma, Marieke; Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan; Nieuwenhuis, Sander – Cognition, 2012
People are able to use temporal cues to anticipate the timing of an event, enabling them to process that event more efficiently. We conducted two experiments, using the fixed-foreperiod paradigm (Experiment 1) and the temporal-cueing paradigm (Experiment 2), to assess which components of information processing are speeded when subjects use such…
Descriptors: Expectation, Cues, Reaction Time, Models
Mussweiler, Thomas; Posten, Ann-Christin – Cognition, 2012
Comparison is one of the most ubiquitous and versatile mechanisms in human information processing. Previous research demonstrates that one consequence of comparative thinking is increased judgmental efficiency: Comparison allows for quicker judgments without a loss in accuracy. We hypothesised that a second potential consequence of comparative…
Descriptors: Priming, Cognitive Processes, Information Processing, Thinking Skills
