Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Source
Educational Evaluation and… | 7 |
Author
Bank, Adrianne | 1 |
Bissell, Joan S. | 1 |
Brown, Robert D. | 1 |
Darolia, Rajeev | 1 |
David, Jane L. | 1 |
Harper, Casandra | 1 |
Lefgren, Lars | 1 |
Osterlind, Steven J. | 1 |
Sims, David | 1 |
Williams, Richard C. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 7 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
California | 1 |
Missouri | 1 |
North Carolina | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Pell Grant Program | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Darolia, Rajeev; Harper, Casandra – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2018
A prominent concern is that college students are harming their long-term economic prospects by making student loan decisions without full information about the implications of their choices. We designed an experiment to examine students' responses to a debt letter, an increasingly popular strategy to provide easily accessible information about…
Descriptors: College Students, Student Financial Aid, Debt (Financial), Decision Making
Lefgren, Lars; Sims, David – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2012
This article develops a simple model of teacher value-added to show how efficient use of information across subjects can improve the predictive ability of value-added models. Using matched student-teacher data from North Carolina, we show that the optimal use of math and reading scores improves the fit of prediction models of overall future…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Mathematics Tests, Reading Tests, Scores

Osterlind, Steven J. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1979
A successful school program evaluation is re-examined to determine what made it successful. Suggestions for future evaluations include: (1) observe the political context of the program; (2) select a useful research design; (3) be sensitive to the subjects; and (4) discuss preliminary findings and be open to rebuttals. (JKS)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Early Childhood Education, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Needs

David, Jane L. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1981
Objectives of Title I evaluations are to document: (1) use by local staff and parents; (2) other types of information used by local staff and parents in judging and in improving their program; and (3) implications of these findings for the current Federal Title I evaluation strategy. (Author/RL)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Elementary Secondary Education, Information Utilization, Program Evaluation

Brown, Robert D.; And Others – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1985
This investigation examined the effect contextual variables had on a national sample of school board members' information needs for decision making. Importance, conflict, and content were found to be associated with board members' needs for time, information, and consultation. (Author/LMO)
Descriptors: Boards of Education, Conflict Resolution, Decision Making, Elementary Secondary Education

Williams, Richard C.; Bank, Adrianne – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1984
Instructional information systems gather and link together data on pupil characteristics, pupil performance on tests, instructional methods, and attitudes and opinions. Results from a study of two instructional information systems indicate that even well-designed systems will only influence decision making under certain conditions. (BW)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Educational Planning, Elementary Secondary Education, Information Systems

Bissell, Joan S. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1979
Characteristics of evaluative studies used by California state legislators are discussed: specificity in addressing particular policy decisions; factors which contribute to or hinder the accomplishment of educational objectives; balanced studies with a range of indicators; and attention to local concerns, and to fiscal and legal issues. (MH)
Descriptors: Accountability, Decision Making, Educational Assessment, Educational Policy