Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Decision Making | 2 |
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| Factor Analysis | 2 |
| Statistical Analysis | 2 |
| Bayesian Statistics | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Flow Charts | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Individual Differences | 1 |
| Interviews | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Psychological Methods | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkVrieze, Scott I. – Psychological Methods, 2012
This article reviews the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) in model selection and the appraisal of psychological theory. The focus is on latent variable models, given their growing use in theory testing and construction. Theoretical statistical results in regression are discussed, and more important…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Statistical Analysis, Psychology, Interviews
Maydeu-Olivares, Albert; Bockenholt, Ulf – Psychological Methods, 2005
L. L. Thurstone's (1927) model provides a powerful framework for modeling individual differences in choice behavior. An overview of Thurstonian models for comparative data is provided, including the classical Case V and Case III models as well as more general choice models with unrestricted and factor-analytic covariance structures. A flow chart…
Descriptors: Flow Charts, Factor Analysis, Structural Equation Models, Decision Making
